this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
135 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59880 readers
4525 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ikidd 6 points 16 hours ago

So which Three Letter Agency is behind this lawsuit? All of them?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

i hope it gets thrown out.

apple sucks generally but them walking back A LITERAL AND EXTRAJUDICIAL WIRETAP was a solid decision.

their announcement of the shit in the first place was what caused me to go through the hell that is moving out of the walled garden. been linux and grapheneOS and dumb watches ever since.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

pinetime, asteroid os and zs watch exist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

nah I don't want a smartwatch.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

understandable

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The proposed class action comes after Apple scrapped a controversial CSAM-scanning tool last fall that was supposed to significantly reduce CSAM spreading in its products. Apple defended its decision to kill the tool after dozens of digital rights groups raised concerns that the government could seek to use the functionality to illegally surveil Apple users for other reasons. Apple also was concerned that bad actors could use the functionality to exploit its users and sought to protect innocent users from false content flags.

Honestly, if they eat this $1.2B fee and chalk it up to standing up for user’s privacy, this is a massive win for them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why exactly is Apple responsible for this?

Should we also hold camera manufacturers responsible for the recording equipment used in child porn?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago

If the recording equipment came with a subscription to a cloud storage provider that automatically uploaded everything you record on it by default and they did not report it to the authorities. Yes, we should.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

They can afford it, too.

“Our record business performance during the September quarter drove nearly $27 billion in operating cash flow, allowing us to return over $29 billion to our shareholders,” said Luca Maestri, Apple’s CFO. (SOURCE)

[–] LorIps 9 points 1 day ago

Do they even have standing to sue? I see that suit getting dismissed the second it reaches a judge

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If they use the tool they get sued. If they remove the tool, believe it or not, sued.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, the amount of resources capitalists waste on bullshit lawsuits is absurd.

It's like people don't realize the lawyers are the ones who always win, so they have a vested interest in convincing people to sue as often as possible.

[–] surph_ninja 1 points 15 hours ago

This isn’t capitalists suing. It’s the intelligence community posing as victims.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

they should never have let the idea gotten so far.. that it became public knowledge. was a fucking stupid idea

[–] subtext 11 points 2 days ago

We have the best technology in the world, because of sue.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago