this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

759 readers
505 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Alphane_Moon 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As I was reading this rather information dense piece (the part on Ruthenium interconnect required multiple re-readings for some reason), a strange thought came to my head.

I imagined a senior Intel executive having to explain this research to Trump (or even his senior advisors). How would you even summarize this in a concise (e.g. x3 bullet points) way while still emphasizing the importance of this research?

"Using "next gen" ruthenium instead of legacy copper for greatly improved semiconductor wiring and electricity distribution"

Something like that? ๐Ÿ˜€

[โ€“] Frozengyro 2 points 1 week ago

New thing better thing. Big money.