this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
78 points (98.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2108 readers
1176 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Attorneys who argued against Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming healthcare at the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed hope that the court's nine justices will take "the opportunity to affirm the essential freedom and equality of all people before the law," while reports indicated that the right-wing majority is inclined to uphold the ban.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So the supremacy clause is dead. Cool.

Now to bring back slavery.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bring back? Slavery is still legal, they just have to jail you first.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 5 points 1 month ago

True - I mean just - masks off, out and proud owning people.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Chief Justice John Roberts … pointed to changes some European countries have made to their gender-affirming care protocols for minors.

Are you fucking kidding me? This is the same man who will utterly humiliate any lawyer who tries to use another country’s legal precedent in the US Supreme Court.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Its the Whose Line Is It Anyway legal theory.

The justifications are made up and the precedents don't matter.

[–] RizzRustbolt 6 points 1 month ago

Oh? So they're going to "deny" rights to transgender folks?

Probably not the best timing for this decision.

[–] Zirconium 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder what the argument is for it and if it would hurt cis people aswell