this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
26 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

779 readers
175 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alphane_Moon 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

One would need competitive markets (not only at the fab level) for "billion in savings" to be passed on the consumer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Well, it's an engineer who said it, not a sales rep.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

TSMC's customers, not retail

[–] Alphane_Moon 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't think TSMC's customer have much leverage either. It's not like they can choose another fab if these hypothetical savings are passed down to (or even shared with) them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

They always are!

But the original prices without such advancements would be much higher, you see :D