this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
3 points (63.6% liked)

Conservative

396 readers
163 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'd be interested in reading this bill as descendants of slaves is a wide net. Jewish people were slaves to the Egyptians, Slavs were enslaved by Romans and Spanish Muslims, Irish enslaved by the English. I'm sure just about all Americans have a slave descendent.

[–] Anticorp 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Last time they worded reparations to exclude white appearing people of black ancestry, which is just outright racism IMO. It's either to make amends for the systemic oppression of your ancestors, which resulted in you personally having a harder time in life, or its not. California made it clear with that distinction that it's not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

To be completely fair, there are issues with this happening in Australia. It has become something of a joke to look at the recipients of aboriginal scholarships or even seats at Universities designated for aboriginal scholars and you wind up seeing visibly white people. This is to not doubt the veracity of their claims or even to necessarily "demote" them as aboriginals, but it becomes potentially harmful to the aboriginals themselves who consistently see visibly white, minimally aboriginal people beating them out for these rewards or obtaining them because there's so little competition.

It would be like making a list of the top 10 Latino scholars in Latin studies and 9 out of 10 of them are light-skinned castizos... Particularly for people from places like Mexico, where discrimination based on coloring thrives, it is unhelpful...

So, I am not saying that the people who remove them are absolutely right... In some cases they are denying people where such a problem may not exist, but I understand some degree of vigilance and gatekeeping.

[–] shalafi 3 points 2 days ago

A California lawmaker said he will introduce a bill

Non-story so far.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You know, this isn't a bad form of reparations. Public universities are owned by the state so it's not like you're forcing private citizens to give anyone anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

If it can be proven, I have no issue with it. I’m not against reparations that make sense. I’d even be fine with a free education for one to two generations as a form of reparations.

What I’m against is an open wallet with no real goal or just a cash handout.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Money taken via taxes is how universities are funded, funneling the money through a university doesn't change what it is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And? College admission is not a good one can sell once they receive it. This isn't comparable to just giving ADOS people money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

A benefit of receiving a state subsidized education certainly has monetary value. If all the people who get in because of that law have to pay out of state tutition costs then your point has validity.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

I thought California was a free state.