this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
117 points (95.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9853 readers
341 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“If someone doesn’t die because of it, we will never know, while the living have to suffer,” Nina Geneson Otis wrote in an email to The Standard. The real estate broker said daylighting is the kind of policy that makes Democrats lose elections.

Holy shit I want these people to suffer. No arguments or debates, these people just suck. I hope they step on a lego every day. Full weight right in the heel.

[–] jaredwhite 2 points 1 week ago

I came here to post the same quote. It made me want to gouge my eyes out. 😭

[–] ambitious_bones 42 points 1 week ago

Others say the city’s actions remove responsibility from pedestrians to look out for their own safety. “A pedestrian can do anything, and be irresponsible, and no harm will come to them?” Brandi said, describing the policies as “idiot-proof.

Pedestrians are literally dying, but sure, no harm done.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

“Pedestrians jaywalk, walk drunk or stoned,” said Richard Brandi, a historic preservationist who lives in West Portal. “Nothing is going to stop those accidents.”

Maybe not driving a car into them would stop those accidents?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Great, so since they're drunk they deserve death. They deserved it because they were drunk. And looking at those two I'm sure they've never been drunk or stoned. Guaranteed if he was drunk and stumbling around and found himself in the street there would be some excuse for why a vehicle should have slowed down

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The San Francisco Standard is a neoliberal rag by a tech venture capital billionaire, so I’m not surprised. It cranks out garbage pushing the agenda of the wealthy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_San_Francisco_Standard

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Then why is this headline weirdly biased to sound like all the community members are blaming pedestrians, instead of that only being two quotes from a more nuanced conversation?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

Still, some think safety measures do more to inconvenience motorists than to protect pedestrians.

Oh no, wouldn't want to be inconvenient to motorist.

Do you know what else is really inconvenient? Death. Tends to mess with your plans.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course they're boomers. Car brained and survival bias in two forms there

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Pale skinned boomers to be exact.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Sometimes I forget how stupid humans are.

No unfortunately I think about it every day.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is he wearing a cardigan/hoodie over his jacket? There might be something off with his judgement...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He's got the look of someone who goes to every single town hall, council or what ever meetings to complain about children.

[–] NarrativeBear 7 points 1 week ago

Why are these two standing right in the centre of what looks to be a road?! Get off the road stupid pedestrians, you're asking to get run over. /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How long until we just have people demanding people drive everywhere for "safety"?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

About -30 years