this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
529 points (99.4% liked)

History Ruins

608 readers
364 users here now

What is a ruin? We’re running off of “You know it when you see it” at the moment. Ruins should be non-functioning structures of some age, or their function reduced to tourism and the like.

Generally speaking, specific items from a ruin should go to [email protected]

Illustrations of ruins (or their reconstructions) should go to [email protected]

Photos of ruins back when they were functioning should go to [email protected]

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

So that’s where New Zealanders get their hobbit zeal from.

[–] sir_pronoun 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We could be turning this world into such a beautiful place! But what are we doing? We keep producing skinny jeans

[–] daikiki 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's pretty, but it was built for purely practical reasons. This is an old towpath, and the bridge is designed in such a fashion that horses towing barges can switch sides without having to unhitch.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why did you have to say that? Now my evening after work is gonna be spent looking at diagrams and videos of how this would work. I have no mental image of what a horse towing a barge would look like.

[–] PugJesus 34 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Surprisingly simple! I grew up near an old towpath that was converted into a hiking trail.

The rope configuration keeps it straight despite the horse being 'off-center'.

[–] lazycouchpotato 2 points 15 hours ago

Fascinating. Thanks for the images!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

These are great! Thanks Pug!

[–] AnUnusualRelic 2 points 21 hours ago

Also, when horses weren't available, people would pull the boats.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

muchos gracias

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

I figured the rudder would also be used to keep the boat straight.

[–] jaybone 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Did these guys really walk directly behind these horses? Do they die when the horse freaks out and kicks?

[–] ThePyroPython 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Well probably just kept an eye on it from the boat.

The real killer was when you approached a canal tunnel a few miles long with no side path. You'd send the horse on ahead to the exit of the tunnel with a rider, and then you and two of your besties would lay back against the top and sides of the boat with your feet against the tunnel arch and walk the boat through in pitch black darkness.

[–] jaybone 4 points 23 hours ago

Yeah there was a post on Lemmy some time back about people doing this. You’d think they would keep a lantern handy for such an occasion though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Fun fact, an interest in canals is called "Gongoozling"

[–] icon4691 3 points 18 hours ago

Thanks for mentioning this! I just remembered that I learned it from "Rosemary & Thyme" The Gongoozlers (TV Episode 2004). Fun mystery series that I highly recommend.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You're looking for canal boats. Back in Ye Olden Days, waterways were the preferred method of transporting cargo because land movement took much more effort (and also frequently involved hills and such). If a large industry cropped up in a place where it wasn't convenient or possible to recreate it elsewhere, and the landscape allowed it, they'd build a canal to allow easier shipping of larger amounts of material. They'd also sometimes build canals next to rivers, so that the water would be slower and it'd be easier for a boat to move both up- and down-stream. Think of places like the B&O Canal or the Erie Canal, or the Intercoastal Waterway.

It's possible for someone to barge-pole a boat around a canal, but a more efficient method was to have a horse or mule harnessed to the boat, walking right next to the canal. They'd walk the canal-side towpath, pulling the boat, while the humans then only had to steer the mule and the boat.

What's likely happening in this picture is that there's a cliff or some other hazard that prevents the towpath from continuing on the right side of the canal. A bridge would be very convenient there anyway, to move the mule to the other side of the river, and if you're building a custom bridge anyway, why not build it so that you don't need to really disturb the team anyway, they can just keep going? It's a really cool idea!

[–] The_v 8 points 1 day ago

A pair of horses or mules could move around 20-30tons of goods with a canal boat. The same pair would have a maximum load of 2-3 tons in a carriage.

Before trains, it was the most efficient way to move heavy loads over long distances.

[–] grue 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Back in Ye Olden Days, waterways were the preferred method of transporting cargo because land movement took much more effort (and also frequently involved hills and such).

And nowadays they're parking lots of floating tiny-houses for people who can't otherwise afford to live anywhere near London, apparently.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

And for storing old shopping trollies.

[–] jaybone 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

What do they do when another boat is coming in the opposite direction?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Lift one boat's rope over the other boat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Wait for them to pass. These things move at like 3mph so you get plenty of warning

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

An awfully large number of things that are now considered 'historical scenic attractions' and 'an integral part of the landscape' were originally built entirely for practical purposes with almost no consideration for aesthetics. Especially bridges and other infrastructure. See also steam trains.

But you try and build new infrastructure and everyone wants to spend 3x the cost on architectural design, screening, or tunnel it underground entirely.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I beg to differ on the abject lack of aesthetic consideration. I’ve skimmed through old construction manuals and from even the surface it seems old masters of the building craft were obsessed with the blending of aesthetics and function

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Buildings yes.

I'm not so sure about infrastructure, especially things like steel girder bridges.

[–] grue 3 points 1 day ago

I think it was because the balance between materials and labor costs was different back then. If everything was being handmade by artisans anyway, why not let them make it look nice while they're at it? Besides, without machine precision, ornamentation is probably quicker and easier than straight lines in a lot of cases.

(See also: traditional architectural styles vs. modernism.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

There's also a reasonable chance that the barges being towed were involved in the manufacture of jeans

[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Landless2029 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Reminds me of airborne for some reason. If it was smooth it'd make a killer run on blades.

[–] theangryseal 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Holy crap! Young Jack Black and Seth Green.

That is the most 90s trailer I’ve ever seen.

I’m gonna watch this movie. I’ll hate it, but love it too. I’m certain of that.

[–] Landless2029 3 points 15 hours ago

This movie is peak 90s. Holy throwback.

[–] aeronmelon 15 points 1 day ago

A Hobbit built this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This image gives me deja vu

[–] Kryptkravler 2 points 21 hours ago

Same for me. For some reason it made me think of Laurel and Hardy. What's up with that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

I just been this place before!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago