Wait. Questioning fascism is faux pas enough to lose your job now?
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
51 points (100.0% liked)
Skeptic
1334 readers
41 users here now
A community for Scientific Skepticism:
Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.
Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.
Things we like:
- Civility
- Thoughtful discussion based on evidence and facts
- Humor
Things we don't like:
- Personal attacks or disrespectful attitude
- Wild speculation on events with no evidence
- Low-effort comments and posts
Other communities of interest:
"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." -David Hume
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I mean, duh. The fascists won full control of the US government. They haven't even gotten started, these are just the social consequences. If this caught you by surprise you haven't been paying attention.
Whether you criticize zionists or Trump supporters, apparently criticizing hate movements has become socially unacceptable...
Is this the cancel culture the right was so against? I'm glad we'll have brothers in arms against such a thing.
Big loss. Laura is one the best science communicators in the planet.
But the country actually is full of fucking fascists...
It's so fucking infuriating that these snowflakes will absolutely lose their shit when someone who is not on the Reich speaks their mind and insults them, but any Reich wing CEO, owner, politician, ~~propagandist~~ "newscaster" can say whatever the fuck they want and they keep their job and act like it's all ok. I don't see Sean Hamface stepping down. I don't see the Twitter billionaire fascist stepping down. Who the hell cares about my pillow, but that fuck is still there.
People with integrity feel they need to step down and all we're left with are fascist assholes.
they may not reflect her beliefs but they sure fuckin reflect mine
Resigned or pushed out by the board?
Unfortunate, but not surprising. Even if one isn't impartial, an editor must at least give the impression of being so. Especially for a non-partisan publication like SciAm.
Yeah well, she’s not wrong.
But you can’t say it out loud. Somehow one side still needs to adhere to keeping the quiet part quiet
Whether you criticize zionists or Trump supporters, apparently criticizing hate movements has become socially unacceptable...