this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1397 readers
88 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

LLMs are quite impressive as chatbots all things considered. The conversations with them are way more realistic and almost as funny as the ones with the IRC markov chain my friend made as a freshman CS student.

Of course, out bot's training data only included the IRC channel's logs of a few years and the Finnish Bible we later threw in for shits and giggles. A training set of approximately zero terabytes in total.

LLMs are less a marvel of machine learning algorithms (though I admit they might play a part) and more one of data scraping. Based on their claims, they have already dug through the vast majority of publicly accessible world wide web, so where do you go from there? Sure, there are a lot of books that are not on the web, but feeding them in the machine is about as hard as getting them on the web to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Senior year of college, I took an elective seminar on interactive fiction. For the final project, one of my classmates wrote a program that scraped a LiveJournal and converted it into a text adventure game.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago

"Admit" is a strong word, I'd go for "desperately attempt to deny".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 12 hours ago

Bullshit. All you need is to scrape together a measley $7 trillion dollars and throw it at Sam Altman.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 12 hours ago

This was really obvious a couple orders of magnitude ago, but I guess at least they stopped lying about infinite scale being an option?