this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
363 points (99.2% liked)

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal

441 readers
94 users here now

Posts and discussion about the webcomic Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal by Hugo Award-winning author Zach Weinersmith (and related works)

https://www.smbc-comics.com/

https://www.patreon.com/ZachWeinersmith

@[email protected]

New comics posted whenever they get posted on the site, and old comics posted every day until we catch up in a decade or so

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/promise-2

Alt textThis is more commonly known as the median voter theorem.

Bonus panel

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I will commit genocide +1?

πŸ€”

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago

I mean that’s essentially what the republicans offered…

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

Well that is basically what Trump offered and it worked

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Aaaand this is the problem with two-party system

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Three party system : I will do everything party A+2 and party B+1

Unfortunately party A&B spent the last 4 decades destroying the education system so no one knows algebra anymore (including me so I might have done that wrong).

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Very well: I promise to kill zero puppies

[–] Agent641 2 points 2 months ago

Opponent: I'll pay a gang to beat me 9/10ths the way to death

[–] Inucune 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

She's all alone (all alone!) in her time of need

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Political Price is Right!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Glad you were here for us to make this comment.

[–] FooBarrington 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Wait... If you add all the numbers together, don't you get 0? Since for every number you're also adding the negative.

[–] Acters 6 points 2 months ago

Huh that would make him the most truthful politician... What a paradox

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You're probably gonna hate this, but I think it actually matters how you add them up. Cuz think if you add 0 + 1 + 2 - 1 + 3 - 2 + 4... that pattern will always be positive. (And this is assuming we're only using integers)

[–] FooBarrington 5 points 2 months ago

And this is why I don't ask the mathematicians in my life to sum up infinite lists of integers anymore. Smh

[–] voldage 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Technically (not really) sum of all positive integers results in -1/12, which is due to the nature of infinite series and MATH I no longer understand. So it stands to reason, that if you add a -1 multiplier and sum results of both series together, you would get 0! Approximately.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

But 0! is 1.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I also can't remember the maths, but iirc the -1/12 value is based on a faulty assumption somewhere in the calculation (probably dividing by 0 at some point)

[–] voldage 2 points 2 months ago

The faulty assumption in the more naive approach was treating operations on infinite series in the same way you would treat operations on finite sums. The order of elements being added is important, as it does change the series, and the naive approach based on putting 0 in between each numbers like 0 + 1 + 0 + 2 + ... which was incorrect. There are ways to prove it does sum up to -1/12 from what I remember though, it's just the addition of 0's that's bad.

[–] Snapz 2 points 2 months ago

6 minute abs

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago