this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
781 points (97.9% liked)

Comic Strips

13905 readers
2490 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 113 points 3 months ago (2 children)

All fun and games until it happens with nazism instead of slime.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Unless it's how to get your 100 Nazi scalps.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Ew gross.

I'm not going to keep the scalps of any Nazi I kill while defending my home and loved ones.

I'll just use pen and paper to keep track.

(I'm not bothered by your comment at all, but am attempting to humorously "yes, and" with it.

I am attempting a homorous misdirect where the reader thinks I'm disgusted by threatening to kill Nazis, but then I'm actually just offended by inefficient messy ways of keeping tracked track of any killed Nazis.)

[–] Sidhean 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The second paragraph of explanation being bigger than the whole joke wraps back around to being hilarious.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I like a clean, minimalist space. No plants, not many picture frames. Definitely would need an excel spreadsheet lol

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

The DuoScalpy streak

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

It's not getting updated anymore, unfortunately, but this is a cool webpage to get a feel for that: http://www.their.tube/

[–] lordnikon 73 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is not a story of the algorithm predicting what you like. It's showing if you expose a human to the same content over and over again. It can change their way of thinking in order to like the thing they are exposed to. Even more so if they don't know how it works and the person think everyone is into slime. I need to be into it too to fit in. It's very powerful if you want to manipulate populous. It's algorithm induced Stockholm Syndrome.

[–] Kelly 24 points 3 months ago

It's showing if you expose a human to the same content over and over again. It can change their way of thinking in order to like the thing they are exposed to.

See also: top 40 radio

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You don't even need an algorithm to do it either. I didn't use Linux when I signed up for Lemmy...

[–] lordnikon 6 points 3 months ago

It's not always a bad thing lol

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 months ago

The phrase "ok slimers" legitimately made me laugh out loud

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I’m certain my YouTube feed is trying to radicalize me into some kind of culture warrior. It’s really annoying. I deleted all of my watch history to try and reset it and it just got way worse real quick. I watch one stupid video, now all I see are angry tubers upset that people don’t think exactly like they do and enjoy things they don’t. Then they convince themselves they’re more enlightened than anyone else because they make this content and ban anyone who makes fun of them, all while claiming to be “free speech advocates” of course.

YouTube got bad so fast it’s left my head spinning.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Have you tried clicking the 3 dots on these outrage videos and selecting "don't recommend channel" or a mix of that and "not interested?" I started to see a bunch of right wing political trash in my feed a while back since a lot of my watched videos could be considered adjacent (cars/trucks/offroading/home improvement/dash cam vids/etc) to what these people like and I haven't really had this issue again.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's wild that right wingers are always complaining about big tech censoring them when YouTube and Facebook are pushing far-right content so much

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

They still think that YouTube and Facebook are representative of the average person. They don't understand how incredible curated those feeds are. I think that's where some of the "silent majority" mythos comes from. Everything they see is people agreeing with them, therefore it's impossible that Joe Biden got more votes in 2020.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's wild that right wingers are always complaining about big tech censoring them when YouTube and Facebook are pushing far-right content so much

I've got a conspiracy theory about this:

  1. Everyone likes kittens.
  2. Some of us who like kittens think about how to act decently to each-other, some of the time.

Leading to:

  1. Right wingers who like kittens will sometimes see something "woke" in their algorithm feed, and they feel attacked.
[–] Jiggle_Physics 4 points 3 months ago

I have done this. I have told them not to post me shit from channels, and topics, over, and over. Best it seems it can go is like 2 months. When I tried deleting my history, and turning it off, it got SO MUCH WORSE. Even making a new account was orders of magnitude worse. As sad as it is, I am actually getting a better result... I have long been at the point where I do not click on things I am not familiar with, or without suggestion from a trusted source. So I just don't look at recommended anymore. Just look for the indicator of new stuff from my subs, or look at things I specifically search for.

[–] Jyrdano 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yup, last week Ive clicked on a YT video of certain game, shut it down about 1 minute in after realising it was just another rage-baiting angry youtuber lamenting how the game is too woke. Now all I get is recommendations of angry anti-woke youtube videos bashing the game I actually enjoy.

[–] Renacles 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Veilguard? I keep blocking those channels.

[–] Jyrdano 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I was being vague to derailing this thread off topic too much.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

I started with a clean profile: I never log in to YT so it's just using a local cookie you can always clear to start over.

Anyways, I just searched a few sciencey things to feed the algorithm and now I'm getting loads of crazy fake "science" and conspiracies and the rest is all extremist right wing bullshit.

YouTube is getting useless.

[–] thedirtyknapkin 5 points 3 months ago

you can turn off watch history all together and it will just give you generic related videos on the side.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

If you want it to just not recommend things, you might prefer switching to an RSS feed, or to something like NewPipe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

All I get recommended are craft and history videos.

[–] BugleFingers 4 points 3 months ago

I get comedy skits and indie games with a splash of science and neat history stuff

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The only reference I have for this was someone who I knew who rubbed said slime on herself for YouTube when she was 17 to build a following for when she turned 18 and started camming.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

That's fucked up

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

Things to get into this week:

  • newpipe
  • freetube

Then you decide where to go from there.

[–] problematicPanther 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

confirmed, this is how i got into lock picking.

[–] synapse1278 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

" Hello, this is the lock picking lawyer, and what I have for you today..."

"Nothing on 3, click on 4, counter rotation on 5, back to the beginning, click on 1, and... We've got this open."

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] synapse1278 5 points 3 months ago

Lol, this is hilarious and pathetic at the same time. At this point, a zip-tie is more secure than a masterlock 😂

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

And that is why I only open videos about topics I am only mildly interested on or from controversial channels in incognito mode even though I actually pay for ad-free YouTube Premium.

On my defense, that is the only streaming service I pay for.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

At least premium has the benefit of paying creators more for your watch time, which is nice.

[–] Agent641 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

TFW you forget to wear protection when clicking on a weird video and you permanently scar your algorithm. You try to heal it, but days or weeks later, you are showing your boss a video on marine grade industrial sealant and Chappell Roan Pink Pony Club shows up in your recommended videos and you have to lie and say you have no idea what it is. When he is gone, you play it again.

[–] damnedfurry 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

clicking on a weird video and you permanently scar your algorithm.

It's trivial to delete individual videos from your watch history, even moreso if you just saw it. Doing so makes it as if you never clicked on it in the first place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ripcord 2 points 3 months ago

Or turn off history tracking and it stops doing that shit

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Tags: Slime Girl

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (6 children)

As recent advances in AI have shown, humans are really quite predictable when you throw enough data and compute at the problem. At some point the algorithm will be sophisticated enough that it'll be able to get to know you better than you know yourself, and will be able to provide you with things you had no idea were what you really wanted.

Interesting times.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Isn't this true for many years now?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but recent advances have really rubbed it in our faces in ways that are a lot harder to deny. Humans haven't become fundamentally more or less predictable over time but recent advances have shown how predictable we are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Yep. I learned from an algorithm that I might enjoy music by "The Beatles". The algorithm was quite correct, but I think my having simple tastes, and the Beatles having amazing music is due most of the credit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Yes, I heard/saw/read that this is exactly what Amazon do, some years back now. They know who you are, what stage of life you are at, and they know what you want before you do.

[–] Schmeckinger 6 points 3 months ago

Yeah algorithms keep throwing stuff at me I would probably like to watch, but I don't click on it to not get even more brain damage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I had this exact experience with music algorithm recommendations:

The algorithm analyzed all the songs I asked it to play, and concluded (correctly) that I might enjoy listening to the Beatles. (True story.)

(Now a bit of sarcasm:) I look forward to future insights, in other art forms, such as perhaps the writings of Shakespeare or the paintings of Leonardo Da Vinci.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Problem is that none of the algorithms actually care about showing you things you like.

Ads try to sell you on things that you wouldn't otherwise buy. Occasionally, they may just inform you about a good product that you simply didn't know about, but there's more money behind manipulating you into buying bad products, because it's got a brand symbol.

And content recommendation algorithms don't care about you either. They care about keeping you on the platform for longer, to look at more ads.
To some degree, that may mean showing you things you like. But it also means showing you things that aggravate you, that shock you. And the latter is considered more effective at keeping users engaged.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago
[–] impudentmortal 2 points 3 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›