this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
24 points (90.0% liked)

Europe

3907 readers
12 users here now

Europa

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What of you just dont do it? Let them wear it if they want. I know this is not for security reasons because youve been able to wear face covering since the start of time on the street.

[–] donuts 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Public places in this context isn't the streets. It's the local government office, the local library, a supermarket - places that will not allow you to cover your whole face. It's sensational to talk solely about burqa's and niqab's, but this applies to motorcycle helmets and balaclava's too, of course.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It’s sensational to talk solely about burqa’s and niqab’s, but this applies to motorcycle helmets and balaclava’s too, of course.

But this is simply just hide the intent of the law. As others have pointed out in below advertising and performance art is allowed. So Gucci Burkas are a-okay legally speaking as they advertise the brand.

Likewise if you look into the issue, Switzerland has also by referendum banned the building of minarets 10 years ago. Both referendums were spear headed by Walter Wobman, a right wing MP whose literal political positions are both anti-migrant and anti-"Islamization".

These things are so transparently racist that you can disprove these talking points about "equality under the law" for face coverings by a few clicks and some light reading.

[–] donuts 0 points 6 days ago

So Gucci Burkas are a-okay legally speaking as they advertise the brand.

If they had a deal with Gucci to advertise for Gucci, yes. Just wearing brand clothing doesn't mean you are legally advertising for them, just practically.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I still think you should have the right to hide your face. It of course gets hard when you start talking about private businesses. I think its an unsolvable problem. You have personal and religious freedom on one side and the safety of others(and maybe sometimes you) on the other side.

[–] zakobjoa -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty sure that just means women who (have to) wear a burqa just stay inside now?!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is also permitted for artistic and entertainment performances and for advertising purposes.

Branded burqas will solve this problem. I'm sure the actual law won't have this loophole, but it's funny to think a little nike check mark would defeat this ban.

[–] zakobjoa 4 points 1 week ago

I mean it is Switzerland.