this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
11 points (92.3% liked)

CAD

262 readers
4 users here now

A general discussion of Computer Aided Design and Drafting software and the industries and hobbies surrounding them. Follow lemmy.world rules and don't be a jerk.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

PDM vs just a network folder....hmmmm.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VandalFan77 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just because a file is checked out by another user doesn’t mean you can’t open it for things like insertion into assemblies or to do a SaveAs if you want to explore design changes without affecting the original. The only reason you should be checking out a file is because you intend to change it. Otherwise, it’s read-only to prevent accidental modification. If you need to modify something that someone may have accidentally checked out, just communicate with them and have them check it back in.

[–] werefreeatlast 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Teamcenter makes it much easier. Basically if you have ownership of a part, you are the only one who can actually check out and check in changes. There are still concurrent issues but at least it's not a daily occurrence that you gotta have this setting on the server. Sometimes I just want to grab the screen and chuck it out the window like in the YouTube videos.

[–] VandalFan77 1 points 5 hours ago

We operated with just a network share before PDM. It made remote work almost impossible because of how long it took to load and save files to the server. Every time. PDM having a locally cached copy requires so much less network traffic. The only network traffic happening when you check new versions in, instead of as you save all day while working.

Also, the ability to search file properties has made finding existing parts and avoidance of duplicate parts so much easier. With just a network share, the only way to find things was a visual search. Our filenames are part numbers and if you didn’t know where to look, finding parts took forever. Also, nobody has to maintain a spreadsheet cross referencing part numbers to descriptions. Just a recipe for errors to have data in two separate places that aren’t linked.

[–] Atropos 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lol, you think this sucker is bad, try their cloud pdm setup. Good lord, I've never hated computers so much

[–] wjrii 1 points 2 weeks ago

Is that the 3DWorks thing that they roll into their hobbyist license as the main gateway to the suite? I've heard it's so bad and confusing that people sometimes don't even realize they've got a license to install Solidworks.

Gotta admit though, I'm a total amateur who mostly does a part at a time.