this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5392 readers
292 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
32
Norway’s Equinor Admits It “Over-Reported” Amount of Carbon Captured At Flagship Project for Years. (www.desmog.com)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vegskret 7 points 1 month ago

Seeing that this is a 67% government owned company (according to Wikipedia), that's not a good look. And seeing that government is stating that it wants to be a leader in sustainability, while also admitting that it is not even close (actually about halfway) to reaching its own carbon emissions goals for 2030, also not a good look. Source in Norwegian

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I don't know folks... It kinda seems like carbon capture might be a scam propped up by polluters who just want to get away with a few more years of destroying the environment to maintain business as usual.