SpaceflightMemes

647 readers

120 users here now

A Lemmy analogue to r/SpaceXMasterRace.

Related communities for serious posts and discussion.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

20 years (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can tiny SpaceX rock Boeing?

They could literally buy part of Boeing's space division if they saw any value in it. How the turntables.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Personally I think while SpaceX has made impressive progress they just aren't technologically advanced enough to fix the mess that is Boeing. Especially considering that leadership is one of the worst areas in SpaceX's own portfolio.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

SpaceX is more technologically advanced than Boeing when it comes to rockets.

Boeing is a slow, clumsy giant that has been necrotic for decades. We're just now seeing the toes fall off. It'll take a long time for Boeing to change, and in the meantime SpaceX will continue to be the leader in rockets.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My point was that while SpaceX might be advanced in trivial fields such as rocket science fixing the huge mess that is Boeing clearly requires technologies that are basically indistinguishable from magic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Lmfao got it - yeah 100% agreed

[+] lemmus -8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The booster catch is not what NASA paid for.

[–] Zer0_F0x 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

NASA paid for the promise of a super cheap, high-availability, super heavy lift vehicle that could land on the moon and on Mars.

Rapidly reusable boosters and ships for refueling in orbit is the most important part of that promise, the landing on the moon and Mars part is relatively easy in comparison and has all been demonstrated by NASA themselves in the past.

Of course that's all just why they pretend to develop such systems, the true reason being American military presence anywhere on the planet within minutes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I agree mostly, even without reusability Starship would be pretty cheap, though. Mass production techniques and cheap materials.

[–] lemmus 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They also paid for and agreed a timeline that included SpaceX landing humans on the moon in late 2025. There’s no way that’s happening anytime soon.

Super cheap reusable boosters are great, but they are worthless unless they help lift something of value, and right now Starship is an empty shell.

Late 2025 could easily become early 2030s.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Late 2025 could easily become early 2030s.

True, but not exclusively because of SpaceX. The lunar suits are delayed, and the Orion heatshield has issues which need to be fixed before flying Artemis II and III.

[–] Diplomjodler3 6 points 1 month ago

NASA selected Starship for the moon landing, so this is exactly what they paid for.