Gee, it's almost like Mass and Cass was just a physical manifestation of the issue, and not the issue all by itself!
The encampment needed to go, but that was never the entire solution because the people living there had to go SOMEWHERE
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)
Boston, MA
1091 readers
44 users here now
Welcome to c/boston,
A community for all things related to Boston, Massachusetts. Whether you're a local, a visitor, or just interested in the city, this is the place to discuss, share, and connect with fellow Bostonians.
Greater Boston area discussion is welcome here.
Rules:
Be respectful: Treat others with respect and courtesy. Personal attacks, trolling, and harassment will not be tolerated.
Stay on topic: Keep discussions relevant to Boston and its surrounding areas.
Official City of Boston Website
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
OK.
I'm not sure leaving a ghetto in place indefinitely is necessarily the right way either.
Hopefully, no one is advocating for doing nothing and leaving it in place. To some degree I think tearing it down was a start, but not a well thought out solution. I personally think that ignoring these sort of encampments only allow the problem to get worse. I think they definitely need to be broken up, but simultaneously services need to be put in place to address these people's issues. Drug addiction, poverty, homelessness from being kicked out of other protective services. The list could go on forever, but these are huge and difficult problems that we need to address.
No I'm with you here.
This is one of those "nobody wants to touch it because they own it" kind of problems, we either leave it forever, or half-ass tear it down with no plan to follow up.
I don't like people who insist leaving them in place forever as a hole of infinite misery is the best option, as if they're defending some great moral principle of allowing people to wallow in hell for their own good.