Agreed.
😉
Discussions for whatever you want to talk about.
Agreed.
😉
I have such conversations in person, but not really on line. Social media is just a firehose of raw data.
I think the ability to enter a conversation like that, or agree to be part of that is predicated on trust and history. I wouldn't expect randos on the internet to respect me, I'm generally anonymous.
no
Maybe a bit cranky. Confusing social media interaction with actually interacting with people is a mistake. It is either extremely atomized (twitter), or painfully slow (lemmy, forums), or chaotic (public chat). These are also all public platforms, and public speech is under different influences to private discussion. There is more face to save, more to loose if you need to move off a position.
Thing is, I don't think humanity has actually changed all that much, we just have a record of more people's speech. What survives of the past is often just what someone thought worth preserving. Prosaic and uninteresting writing by ordinary folk was discarded. Prosaic and uninteresting writing by notables went unpublished and valued only by a collector. Now every kid's first stumbling around philosophy is recorded for the world to see.
To answer your question, I regularly have such conversations, sometimes in text, or voice call, sometimes in person but almost always in private and real-time. As most conversations have always been. I am somewhat curious though, about when you think the decline happened?