this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
158 points (98.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1939 readers
318 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
158
Trump had a seven-part plan to overturn the 2020 election, according to the January 6 Committee (self.usa)
submitted 1 month ago by btaf45 to c/[email protected]
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

  1. Trump had knowledge that he lost the 2020 election but spread misinformation to the American public and made false statements claiming significant voter fraud led to his defeat;

  2. Trump planned to remove and replace the Attorney General and Justice Department officials in an effort to force the DOJ to support false allegations of election fraud;

  3. Trump pressured Vice President Pence to refuse certified electoral votes in the official count on January 6, in violation of the U.S. Constitution;

  4. Trump pressured state lawmakers and election officials to alter election results in his favor;

  5. Trump's legal team and associates directed Republicans in seven states to produce and send fake "alternate" electoral slates to Congress and the National Archives;

  6. Trump summoned and assembled a destructive mob in Washington and sent them to march on the U.S. Capitol; and

  7. Trump ignored multiple requests to speak out in real time against the mob violence, refused to instruct his supporters to disband, and failed to take any immediate actions to halt attacks on the Capitol.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_hearings_of_the_United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_the_January_6_Attack#7PartPlan

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rickdg 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How nice that Americans are pretending like the two candidates are almost equivalent.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Don't confuse the for-profit media with actual people.

Most boots on the ground humans know the difference, and that's what is so scary, bc they will vote as they will because - not in spite of - this.

Source: have you ever talked with a magat sometime in the last few years? They mean it (or at least think they do).

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

Insurrectionist and traitor.

[–] AlternatePersonMan 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These are all ridiculously evil, but #7 should really be all the evidence it should take to convince anyone.

All he had to do was say "stop," but he refused. No other president would have gotten away with sitting idle while their capital was being overthrown.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The real profanity here is that protecting the capital is an official duty of the President, meaning the recent Supreme Court ruling likely gives him full criminal immunity for failing to do so adequately.