this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024

68 points (100.0% liked)

Astrophotography

1706 readers

25 users here now

Welcome to !astrophotography!

We are Lemmy's dedicated astrophotography community!

If you want to see or post pictures of space taken by amateurs using amateur level equipment, this is the place for you!

If you want to learn more about taking astro photos, check out our wiki or our discord!

Please read the rules before you post! It is your responsibility to be aware of current rules. Failure to be aware of current rules may result in your post being removed without warning at moderator discretion.

Rules

I | Real space images only.

Astrophotography refers to images of astronomical objects or phenomena exclusively.
~~Images that show objects or people below the Kármán Line (100km) will be removed.~~ We won't be enforcing this rule for now, but as the community grows eventually we will split and have a separate space for just landscape astro.
Images must be an accurate representation of a real astronomical object.
See this page for more details

II | Original and Amateur Content Only

Image posts can only be images that you have captured and processed yourself, or discussion about capturing and/or processing your own images.
Images acquired from public sources, professional observatories, or other professional services are not allowed.
If you have done a drastic alteration or reprocessing of a prior submission, you may repost your edit - but only after a minimum of one week has passed.

III | Post Types

Image posts are to link directly to the image, not to landing pages, personal galleries, blogs, or professional sites. Link to these in the comments. (AstroBin and Imgur, are allowed)
Questions are welcome here for the time being.
Links to blogs, articles or external websites should be interesting and promote discussion about amateur astrophotography.

IV | Titles

All image posts should just include include the name of the object being photographed. Extra info such as equipment, it being your first image, or other information should go in a comment along with your acquisition info. Please see this page for more details.

If your post is removed, try reposting with a different title. Don't hesitate to message the mods if you still have questions!

V | Acquisition and Processing Information

All submitted images must include acquisition and processing details as a top-level comment. All posts without this information may be given a warning, and if not updated will be removed.
This includes the telescope, mount, camera, accessories, and any other pieces of equipment you used to capture the image.
You must also include processing details, i.e. the programs you used and a general rundown of the workflow/processes you used within those programs. “Processed in Photoshop” is not enough.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

bigborpa

lefty7283

C/2023 A3 & M5 (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by bistdunarrisch to c/astrophotography

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We got extremely lucky and got a tiny window of cloudless sky in an never ending sequence of cloudy nights. Also the conditions were a nightmare with severe light pollution and lights shining directly at our equipment.

Samyang 135mm f2.0
Fuji X-T5
158 x 5s
ISO 125
@f2.8

And maybe somebody here can explain to us what the ionized gas is that 'shoots out‘ in front of the comet?

Also do the colours seem to be correct? We tried our best at background extraction and maintaining the true colour, but the raw data was of poor quality. From images of other comets the dust tails normally seems to have a yellow/orange colour and only the plasma tail is blue.

Edit: found the answer to the Anti-tail. It shows the trail of dust were the comet has traveled, which appears to come out at the opposing side because of earths angle relative to the comet and sun.

top 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm new to astro, is it necessary to stack so much photos to see this comet? Whats the difference between single shot and stacked in this case? Thanks!

[–] bistdunarrisch 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The comet is also visible on one single exposure as it is very bright. It was also visible to the naked eye. But stacking reveals even more details because it improves the signal to noise ratio. Also stacking helps removing unwanted objects like satellite trails, planes or moving clouds.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I see. Thanks for the answer!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This I took holding an iPhone on a picnic table. See the difference? All the details that OP managed to get?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's extremely good for a phone camera I assume. I did try with my own camera a few days ago. I originally asked because weather conditions in my area wasn't great for a while, and I don't know what settings to start off with. I did my best at stacking and editing them with Affinity, although not the greatest, I did manage to capture something haha.

Edit: camera specs
Fujifilm X-S10 + Sigma 18-50
ISO640, F/2.8, 5 sec x 140

[–] bistdunarrisch 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It‘s hard to tell from your image, bit it appears you can even get a bit more details if you register your lights onto the comet itself and then stack all the images. I used Siril for the two step registration process.

But nice image nonetheless!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks! I did try with DSS afterwards to only slightly better results? I'll give Siril a try too. What do you mean by "register the light to the comet"? Is it a Siril specific setting?

[–] bistdunarrisch 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I do not have much experience with DSS, as far as I know the result should be very similar. „Lights“ is the term for a single exposure. The technique is basically the same no matter which software you use.

But if you have Siril specific questions feel free to drop any questions :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh okay, so you mean the light frames. Got it.
Though, I still don't understand what you mean by "registering the light frames to the comet itself". I have 140 frames of the comet (albeit not in the same position since I don't have an astro tripod), and I imported them all into the light frame stack. That's what I'm supposed to do, or do you mean a more specific step than that?

Thanks again!

[–] bistdunarrisch 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ah ok, so I assumed you registered all your light frames onto your stars as your stars look very sharp. And that’s the normal way for every astro image you would normally do. A comet however moves so fast that its position changes even in the short time frame were you took the images.

So after registering all the images with the stars pattern you want to make a second registration were you mark the position of the comet on the first frame and on the last frame. With that now all images are aligned onto the comet and now the stars appear to move in the background. As your stars look so sharp I assumed you didn’t make the second registration. In DSS there is a comet mode for that but I haven’t worked with that so I can’t tell you about the workflow with that program.

Hope that helped in any way!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Oh nah, I did try my best to focus on the stars. They look bright in the photo because I removed the background and cranked up the contrast after stacking in Affinity. It was almost a flat grey image after stacking and before I photoshopped it. Maybe I did fuck up somewhere in the process haha.

I only ran through the stacking process once, never encountered a setting/dialogue which told me to select where the comet was. Maybe I'll play around the program a bit and see some tutorials. There's no way for me to take comet pictures again where I'm at. Cloudy skies these days 🫤

[–] cabron_offsets 3 points 2 weeks ago

Dope

[–] Zachariah 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yours is beautiful.

This was all I could get with long exposure on my phone when the sky was dark enough but the comet had not yet set. It’s flat here, so this was the clearest view of the horizon and (despite those lights) the darkest area I could find. To the naked eye, it was a smudge. The bright spot only shows in the pic.

[–] bistdunarrisch 2 points 2 weeks ago

Your image looks not to bad either. On my phone the comet looked the same like yours.

[–] mesamunefire 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A set of trees are in the say literally right now :( We went on top of a building but only a couple of stories up.

Awesome photo. I shall live through all of your photos.

[–] bistdunarrisch 2 points 2 weeks ago

Lets see what the next days will bring. As the comet rises higher maybe it will be even more visible.

[–] lefty7283 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Love the colors!

[–] bistdunarrisch 1 points 2 weeks ago

Cool thank you!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm going to take a wild guess here, but if you look at your first frame and last frame, does the comet appear to have moved backwards? I'm wondering if the strange plasma you see in the front is just an artifact of the stacked results. Stacking comets can be a bit tricky due to their movement.

That being said, absolutely amazing shot!

[–] bistdunarrisch 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Thanks for answering! Yes the comet moved quite a bit, but I stacked two images. One for the stars and one for the comet were I registered the images onto the comet itself. So the stream seems to be a real feature of the comet.