Technology

63090 readers

6443 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

101

How Signal Walks the Line Between Anarchism and Pragmatism (www.wired.com)

submitted 2 years ago by ooli to c/technology

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] LemmyNameMyself 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you don't want to use Signal, use a forked version of it - Session (doesn't require a phone number, only has a code number as id) or SimpleX Chat (not even a code number, completely private)

[–] Tangent5280 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How does simplex users then connect with each other?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The fact that signal uses phone numbers as it's primary identifier seriously undermines their privacy claims. AIM with both parties using OMEMO was more private and secure

[+] [email protected] 63 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It blows my mind that people still do not understand this.

[+] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] kroy 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you are required to give them information that they can use to figure out who you are, it’s not anonymous.

So if you are on normal post-paid cell phones, where you have given them your real info, or use a credit to pay for it with your name on it, etc. that means you aren’t anonymous.

So when super secret drug lord is caught, they can figure you were talking to this drug lord and charge you, because they have his end of the communications and can verify with your cell provider who YOU are.

Privacy just means they don’t know what you are saying. They may know you are communicating with drug lord but not what you are saying.

You can have neither, one or the other, or both

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I think signal is a good inbetween because its privacy focus, even though it uses phone numbers. Which as you said and i agree with it makes it less anonimus however picking apart that it uses phone numbers. you could also dig deeper and say that using any app on a device not made by you could have spyware in the OS or in the lower level permissions (bios, firmware) aswell as what if a government agency made a honeypot server that uses the protocol for simplex as example such as arcane OS and how it was sold as the most secure phone which ended up being a honeypot. so i think its fair to say its secure enough for normies who want more privacy focused but not be mr.robot levels, which signal claims to be private which it is minus the use of phone numbers. but realistically if in the examples given, if you where to message a Bad actor and said bad actor was arrested and they used signal to message you. all they can get is that they messaged you which wouldn't really hold up in court because although you where in contact with said person doesnt mean you where doing something illegal and if you dont incriminate your self (such as pleading the 5th) they really cant do a whole lot to charge you with something. which for those who know signal ownly knows the time and date of messages sent and online time as described in this artical https://www.dailydot.com/debug/signal-subpoena-privacy-gag-order/

[–] kroy 5 points 2 years ago

If you are required to give them information that they can use to figure out who you are, it’s not anonymous.

So if you are on normal post-paid cell phones, where you have given them your real info, or use a credit to pay for it with your name on it, etc. that means you aren’t anonymous.

Privacy just means they don’t know what you are saying. They may know you are communicating with drug lord but not what you are saying.

You can have neither, one or the other, or both

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The person who responded to you explained it perfectly!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

anonymity can provide you another layer of obfuscation which strengthens your privacy.

[–] chickenwing 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's why I use matrix. No phone number.