this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
221 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

1383 readers
368 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

LG's TV business is heightening focus on selling ads and tracking.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is one of the reasons I've never connected my TV to the internet and I never will. I use a mini PC running Linux with a remote and wireless keyboard. It's much more capable than whatever is built into a TV.

[–] PineRune 29 points 1 month ago

slaps back of smart tv this baby has 256MB of RAM!

tv unresponsive for 30 seconds after turning on, loading the RAM full of adware

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

We have AppleTVs on every TV in the house and none of the TVs have ever been connected to the home network. Same with the rest of the extended family.

We also have a HDHomeRun in each house for those rare occasions when we want to watch Broadcast TV.

The only time a TV changes from HDMI1 is when someone wants to play PS or XBox.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wonder if it is possible to sue TV makers for adding ads after you purchased the device.

[–] grue 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It shouldn't be a matter of suing; the companies (and their executives personally) should be criminally prosecuted for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by exceeding authorized access. Nobody legitimately consents to having their property sabotaged and used to exploit them, so this enshittification should be treated like any other instance of malicious hacking.

[–] grue 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

And another thing: it is absolutely an indictment of American society how we've all been conditioned to tolerate this shit, to the point that only one person in this thread even manages to think of it as a civil tort and everybody else just sort of shrugs and discusses technological workarounds.

Where the Hell is the righteous anger‽ We should be marching on the FTC with fucking torches and pitchforks, to force them to start doing their goddamn jobs again!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where the Hell is the righteous anger‽

The ember is still there. Once in a while it flares up. But it burned too bright for too long, and is part of the reason why I'm a cynical husk of a human being. I advocate for privacy-centric thinking among friends and family but it's either preaching to the choir (in the best cases), blank stares, or they've already got an Amazon speaker in every room just to turn the lights on/off and set timers.

tl;dr I'm tired, boss.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Those last two scenarios are painfully accurate.

I am also tired.

[–] madcaesar 4 points 1 month ago

There's just soooo many idiots vs people that care and educate themselves on privacy.

Every once in a while I visit friends or stay at hotels and catch a glimpse of cable... My God it's just endless ads with minutes of shows sprinkled in.

And they are paying for it.......

[–] tibi 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We need better consumer protection laws.

Why is it legal for companies to collect every data they want or the ability to turn it off (and not allow you to use the device you purchased unless you consent to their abusive EULA)? Why is it legal for companies to remove functionality from a device after the purchase? Why is it legal for companies to prevent you from using devices you paid for unless you agree to forced arbitration (and there's no way to withdraw your consent).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I believe so.
But if it goes anything like most class action lawsuits, it'd take forever, and if they don't manage to absolve themselves because you clicked 'Agree' on the TOS screen (even though the TV wouldn't work otherwise), the final settlement would be a whopping $12

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Step 1. Buy "smart" TV on sale
Step 2. Use the money saved to buy/build a streaming box of your own choosing
Step 3. Never ever connect the fucking TV to the internet

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've heard it will hop open networks to try to update. Doesn't sound that farfetched in 2024. If you're really concerned, you could disable the wireless adapter...

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not many people run open networks these days. I would be more worried about the things creating a mesh network to download ads from anyone who gave their TV internet access.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The local cable monopoly supplies modem/router/AP combos that broadcast unsecured WiFi hot spots. For "convenience" of its customers.

Pre-submission edit: there may be an authentication page upon connecting to verify that you're a legit customer. I've never tried it personally and have no intention on doing so.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't seen that configuration in a long time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

At least one neighbor has a stock box holding down the fort.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I'm sure some do. I don't have any evidence either way, though. Would be very interested if someone had some hard info.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I notice a major trend of all the largest companies majorly shooting themselves in the stock with turbo greed, even more greed than normal. I feel like we're on the verge of a stock market slaughter.

"maximum ads", "X basic necessity as an investment", "price gouge everything via cartels/monopolies" and "X as a service" are the death nails of the current economic order.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's everything.

Watch advertising that is an annoyance to have to wait through and won't sway your purchasing decisions in any way, or pay us more money than you would ever consider it worth it to have the no advertisement version.

Oh and we will track your every move on our service so we can work out the best way to ~~gouge your eyes out~~ extract the most money from you in the future.

Legit makes me want to sit down and create "advertising and data tracking free land" to live in. I guess that's a tropical island in the Pacific.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

to have the no advertisement version.

You mean, "to have the less advertisement version".

Edit: autocorrect

[–] BigDaddySlim 8 points 1 month ago

"LINE MUST GO UP! LINE MUST GO UP!"

The board members chant collectively while convulsing and foaming at the mouth

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

watch them download ads over ultrasound mesh networks

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Glad I’ve kept mine offline all this time. Also have a PiHole that I hope would stop this shit too.

I got enough of it from Samsung.

For the amount of money I paid for these TVs, I should get a discount if you’re going to shove some ads down my throat. Especially when most of them are irrelevant to my interests.

[–] madcaesar 6 points 1 month ago

Paid products should have ZERO ads whether relevant or not. I cancelled Amazon prime the minute they added ads into videos. Fuck that shit.

As a consequence my Amazon shopping has taken a nose dive. I used to buy shit constantly because I had free shipping now I have to really really REALLY need something and even then I'll wait till I need at least 35$ worth to still get free shipping.

If more people stood up to enshitification we'd be much better off as consumers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Exact reason I'm using a shield pro now with the TV disconnect from the Internet

[–] taiyang 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't noticed, but I did hear you can root WebOS TVs which include LGs. I may look into it if it gets intrusive. The front page is already showing ads, after all, although not nearly as awful as my fire stick was before.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Note you may want to check your versions and avoid updating in case they patch out debug or bypass functionalities. I vaguely remember concerns about that on some models.

[–] SendMePhotos 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I really do miss old TVs. I don't want/need a smart TV yet that's all they sell.

Matter of fact I don't need channels. All I need is a giant monitor. No volume control, no channels, just like 3-4 HDMI, power button, and some screen settings.