this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
218 points (95.0% liked)

Games

16926 readers
1728 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] glimse 186 points 2 months ago (1 children)

TLDR: a guy who beta tested Half-Life found a CD of said beta

[–] DaddleDew 37 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And might be sued by Valve shortly

[–] glimse 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing he signed an NDA so I'm not sure what he was thinking distributing it so publicly.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do NDAs last for 25 years or something?

[–] glimse 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

NDA was the wrong term to use there but I'm sure there was a "don't give the game to anyone" in there they might be enforceable. I hope they don't sue, though

[–] AlijahTheMediocre 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think Valve is going to do anything about a 20 year old beta being leaked.

[–] glimse 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Me neither but it's still a bold move

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, knowing how easy it is for just about anyone to contact GabeN (his email is publically accessible) and that this was a previous tester, I would say there's decent odds they're already contacted someone to make sure or already had permission to do so in some roundabout way. I have no way of knowing for sure, obviously, but it is super weird for this to pop up without the finder messaging anyone in Valve about it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't think the email of a CEO is a very private matter as you can probably very easily be found if you try hard enough. At least in comparison to telephone, home adresses etc.
I mean it's usually given name, surname + given name, initals and the domain.
So what? [email protected]?

Actually the first result for "email ceo apple" gives me the result

What is Tim Cook's email address? Email Tim Cook care/of Apple, [email protected] (Direct) or [email protected] (Media/Public Relations). 🤝 How do I meet Tim Cook?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Some organizations will setup a Honeypot/blackhole CEO email using common corporate email designs, then the actual CEO email will be something else entirely. One organization I worked at the CEO email was a actually just a randomized string

But in the case of Valve, Gabe Newell has generally encouraged people to email him which is unusually open compared to many companies whose leadership will ignore or even threaten anyone who stumbles into their inbox

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

That is certainly true, I guess I needed to specifically call out that he actually does reply. And this has been a constant recurring "rediscovery" every few years that GabeN personally responds to that email.

That also wasn't the particular point I was even talking about. The point was that a previous dev would most likely still have connections inside Valve given how easy it is for outsiders. And that even if they had zero connections, again, it would be super easy to get a response.

This is all just speculation, but a relatively confident one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Bravery means doing the right thing even when it's dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 2 months ago

Huge -> literally nothing will change, even for die-hard half life fans.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“ “ - Gordon Freeman (New dialogue found on beta disc)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Holy crap, a space?!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Jessup managed to burn the intact Half-Life CD

What?

[–] Zahille7 42 points 2 months ago (8 children)

"Burning" a CD means copying it. Idk why. I used to have someone in my family who would burn movies for everyone so we didn't have to pay to rent or own.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It is sort of surreal to see someone so young they don't know what burning a CD is in an article about a game older than CD burners.

[–] Nibodhika 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Just a small correction (that makes things worse):

It is sort of surreal to see someone so young they don't know what burning a CD is writing an article about a game older than CD burners.

The person asking the question here is correct, the phrase in the article makes no sense, and it's likely written by someone who heard the lingo "burn" in reference to discs but it's too young to have use it themselves (otherwise they would have said they ripped the intact CD, or they burned copies of it)

Edit: Also I think CD burners came out around the same time (I remember a store that sold copies in my city back in the 90s), although I personally didn't had a disk burner for many years (but also I didn't played Half-life for many years after it came out, so I guess it evens out)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

CD-Rs and CD burners were first available in the early 90's but they were "we'll take the helicopter out to the yacht" expensive. By 1998 they were starting to become normal consumer-grade equipment. I had one as a teenager in the year 2000, along with a Rio CD-MP3 player.

I've still got the computer I had in later high school and college, a Pentium 3 rig that I plan on turning into a sleeper PC for my midlife crisis. It has a DVD-ROM drive and a CD burner. I wonder if they're SATA or some older "we don't do it this way anymore" buses? I remember that machien talking about SCSI during boot-up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Half-Life is definitely not older than home CD burners. Now if you'll excuse me, there's some damn kids on my lawn again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Burning is writing a disc. Ripping is extracting data from a disc. Whoever wrote the article used lingo they don't understand.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That is what I thought, I have burned many discs in my day, and I have never got an ISO from bruning a disc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah I would read "managed to burn the disc" to mean "managed to create a new CD-R copy of the original." "Managed to rip the disc" would mean successfully created an .iso file.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zahille7 2 points 2 months ago

I knew it had to do with putting data on a disc. I didn't know the specifics.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Yes, yes we are.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I haven't thought about burning CDs in a long time, man that takes me back. Remember Nero Burning ROM?

I think the etymology of the term is that when you're writing data onto a disk you're shooting a laser onto it to alter the chemistry and change its color, for which "burning" the data into it makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It wasn't the colour, you would burn little bubbles into the disk. The bubbles would deflect a laser and flat parts would not. This would give the 0 or 1 bits.

There were CD- and CD+ versions. I don't know which is which but one would create a divot, and the other would create a bubble. Either way the laser is diverted away from the sensor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah, that's what it was! I always thought it was just a different color for 0 and 1, today I learned! That makes more sense when I think about it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

CD - red laser

BlueRay - blue laser.. shorter wavelength --> more data on same size disk

and inbetween there was DL - dual layer
light scribe - could etch a picture on the top of the cd
and RW - rewriteable CDs

(CD is short for compact disc)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (35 children)

What I ment was that bruning a disc is the secondary step to making a copy if a disc, you first need to rip the original disc into an ISO file.

I remember when we got our first CD burner, it was a black and copper colored Philips unit, it was back when you made sure to leave the computer alone when burning a CD because you you didn't want to risk buffer underrun.

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Idk why.

When writing to a CD-R, the laser literally burns a chemical in the disc which causes it to change optical properties, which will cause it to appear to be the same as the pits and lands on a manufactured disc. "Burning a disc" meant to write it. It's not the original that's being burned, it's the new copy. In casual conversation someone might say "I really like this album." "Tell you what I'll burn it for you." short for "I'll burn a copy of it onto a new disc for you."

The line "Jessup managed to burn the intact Half-Life CD", in the context of "thought lost to disc rot", I would extrapolate this to mean that the original old CD was thought to be damaged or destroyed due to age or mishandling, but he was successfully able to copy the data onto a new CD. Handling or using the fragile original my cause the data to be lost, so copying it to a new disc better preserves it.

The word "rip" is usually used to mean take all the data off of a CD and store it elseways. "I ripped the CD to my hard drive." The nuance is, there isn't a new optical disc, the data just exists on a computer's internal storage. Which is probably what they actually did.

The term "burn" survived into the USB thumb drive age to differentiate writing the contents of a .iso file to a thumb drive replacing any file system or data that is currently there from simply storing a copy of the .iso among the existing file system. Often the same software you'd use for CDs would be used to image thumb drives as well so the "BURN!" button would be used to start both processes. Unlike on a CD-R nothing gets permanently altered on a USB drive.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

When you burn a disc it means using a laser to etch the data as pits and lands in a track on the disc. You're physically changing the disc when you write to it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Burning was originally used in the sense that to write to a disc you used the laser to "burn" in your data, at least irrc. It just started to be used interchangeably for copy and write operations. These days I think "rip" makes more sense.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've literally never heard anyone use "burn" to refer to extracting data. This thread feels like someone trying to gaslight me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] I_Clean_Here 5 points 2 months ago

Oh no, it finally happened

[–] Mango 8 points 2 months ago

CDs are actually really small. You're just used to higher density storage.

load more comments
view more: next ›