==================================================================
Bring the corpses of the victims to protest, march them to the capital, and let their bodies rot in front of the public and media.
Participants are expected to protect the corpses even with the cost of their own lives when they are confronted by an armed force in a violent attempt to remove those corpses.
All who died on the street stay on the street. The march will not stop until apologies are issued, demands meet, policy changes, and criminals are prosecuted. The march will not stop, no matter how long it takes, or the cost of human life.
That is the basic of it.
==================================================================
Police brutality, workplace accident due to deregulation, miscarriage, mass shooting...
==================================================================
The dilemma the government will face
The corpse will decay, the longer they drag on before an action is taken the worse outlook it will seem — for both the decaying corpses and the public perception regarding the authority’s handling of the issue. The situation will create a timed pressure that cannot be discharged, downplayed, or ignored.
Employ force to disperse the protest will cause more death, escalate.
==================================================================
Optically hard to go against.
==================================================================
Propose a viable solution to government.
prove the issue is solvable. People can compare our proposed solution against the government proposed solution and form opinion based of the discrepancy.
==================================================================
more careful in engagement
one think you cannot do is fight back. Lay out condition. If they breach the condition.
==================================================================
Compare corpse march to hunger strike and self-immolation.
All three are extreme protest measure.
It is a timed urgency same as hunger strike, one risk or starving to death, another become hazardous and visually appalling pass a certain time.
It’s like self-immolation, it’s shocking, it generates conversation, but you are not engaging in a suicide. You take care of yourself up until pigs in uniform bash you dead on the head.
==================================================================
strip the corpse naked, put it on a cross, put all the scars and bruises for all to see, flooding it on internet on every popular sites, blasting horrific and agonizing screech and all that... Is it moral? Yes. Yes Yes Yes. It is. If it gets people to talk to, if it turn people off, if it make people angry. Then it is! You do not get to distance yourself from the brutality. You do not get to lecture us for disrupting your peace, WHEN WE HAVE NONE! Anger is the last expression a brutalized victim wanted! They would not want peace their abuser offered.
They(criminals, murderers, people responsible) should be afraid of walking under the sun, for from now on, the only thing that protects them is the four walls of their cell.
==================================================================
What about children? What about those who suffered from depression, or traumatized? Should they be exposed to this horrific scene?
They already did! Children are face with deadly shooting every school day. There’s multiple wars, insurgency and a genocide ongoing. Why do you care now all the sudden?
==================================================================