AskHistorians

That's easy. Liberals. The entire idea of not having an aristocracy and monarchy was a liberal experiment. But these aren't the liberal and conservative terms you're used to today. In their time we'd all be classified as liberals. Unless you want an oppressive aristocracy, then you'd be a conservative. Now we use the term Classical Liberalism to describe them.

In broad strokes, you could say they were liberal, but I'd just like to preface this by cautioning not to put too much stock in those terms as a way of viewing the Founding Fathers or the period, especially considering the connotations liberal and conservative have now in terms of policy positions.

That being said, they were largely considered radicals, to varying degrees. John Adams was the most conservative, but even he would have been considered a radical in Britain, itself one of the most liberal polities in Europe at the time. Washington and Madison were also somewhat conservative leaning, but again - they were less conservative than Adams, and we've already established Adams as a radical. Benjamin Franklin was the most radical, and seems nearly modern in his views.

In general, you're looking at a time of such great experimentation that even radicals of the period can appear to have wildly varying views on what 'direction' to take going forward that don't neatly map onto modern left/right liberal/conservative sort of identities.

Do you have a question about something more specific about their positions? Like, economics, centralization of power, religion, foreign affairs...? Or about the policies of other polities of the period?

That category could encompass a pretty large set of people depending upon what exactly you mean. You might want to give a list of names.