Between this and the likely Henderson sale it looks likely we've sold enough to finance a striker, the difference between selling elanga or not could be pretty huge for our season.
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)
Red Devils
927 readers
7 users here now
All things Manchester United.
New to the community? Come say hi in the Welcome thread.
Got any suggestions on how we can improve and grow as a community? Let us know!
Basic rules:
- Fuck the Glazers
- Be civil to each other
- No non-Manchester United/football content. Non-United content is allowed if it affects United in some way. Otherwise, use the Daily Discussion Thread
- Fuck the Glazers
- Before posting news, please refer to the Journalist Reliability Guide
- Keep it legal - no streams please :)
- Have fun!
- Fuck the Glazers
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Agreed. If we can get between 30-35m from Elanga and Henderson that would be enough to buy Hojlund.
If the reported budget of 120-130m is true, we would realistically have up to 165m after selling Elanga and Henderson.
Deduct 105 (Mount 55m + Onana 50m) from that 165m, we would have 60m to spend on Hojlund.
Once we sell Fred, McGuire we can focus on getting a #4 CB and another backup midfielder.
I thought we had 100m to spend? Either way I hope you are right with the reported budget. Regardless even if our budget was 100m, our sales would be enough to to get a striker in
Genuinely feels like it's becoming one of our best transfer windows in a long time. Good work coming in and out.
Definitely. I hope we’re able to move one midfielder, Maquire, and pick up one backup CB. Potentially Evans.
One more attacker (in addition to Hojlund) would be nice too. But that’s probably unrealistic.