this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
91 points (98.9% liked)

Criminal Justice and Crime

80 readers
3 users here now

This is a Lemmy.World community for discussions of Criminal Justice and crime.

Rules:

  1. This is a community about criminal justice. Posts should relate to criminal justice, crime, policing, courts and litigation, and other related topics. Posts about crime should be about a noteworthy crime, not "run of the mill" crimes.

  2. Be civil. You do not need to support criminal justice reform to participate in this community and civil discussions are encouraged.

  3. Posts should be news, discussions, or images related to criminal justice. Memes and humor are allowed but should not be excessively posted.

  4. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Utilizing such language in your username will also result in a ban.

  5. Follow site-wide rules.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Theoriginalthon 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

First I'm not from the USA, so... She attempted to vote when wasn't sure if she could, didn't read terms and conditions (affidavit) The checks that were in place to make sure it didn't happen worked, no vote cast Attempted to vote when not allowed = jail Wtf USA that's one of the most stupid things I've ever heard

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

You forgot: was Black

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I personally belive that most legal punishments serve the purpose of preventing further crimes to be committed by the people already known to commit crimes, unless the crime is with victim, which in this case it isn't. So by this principle it is entirely nonsensical to persecute someone, since the crime to be prevented doesn't require them to be locked away.