Ext4 for general pupose linux. Zfs for bsd network drives
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
92 points (91.8% liked)
Linux
48209 readers
828 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
It depends, for a normal user? Ext4, maybe btrfs because in terms of stability is the best {but u lose some functions like the ability to make a swap file, wich today isn't really that useful, but u lose the ability to make one). Want something really fast fort large files? ZFS, but if u experience an energy loss it could be really catastrophic.
Ext in general is so good that even to this day android it's still using EXT2, 2!
You can make a swap file on btrfs.
First of all, thanks this r news for me. But I don't think is a good idea to use the swap file in btrfs.
It is supported since kernel 5.0
There are some limitations of the implementation in BTRFS and Linux swap subsystem:
filesystem - must be only single device
filesystem - must have only single data profile
subvolume - cannot be snapshotted if it contains any active swapfiles
swapfile - must be preallocated (i.e. no holes)
swapfile - must be NODATACOW (i.e. also NODATASUM, no compression)
With active swapfiles, the following whole-filesystem operations will skip swapfile extents or may fail:
balance - block groups with extents of any active swapfiles are skipped and reported, the rest will be processed normally
resize grow - unaffected
resize shrink - works as long as the extents of any active swapfiles are outside of the shrunk range
device add - if the new devices do not interfere with any already active swapfiles this operation will work, though no new swapfile can be activated afterwards
device delete - if the device has been added as above, it can be also deleted
device replace - ditto
Yes, there are some limitations to be aware of, with how it interacts with certain features. But EXT4 doesn't have any of those features at all. It doesn't have CoW, or balance, or multi-device, or snapshots.
If the filesystem, is single-device, and you have the swapfile on it's own nocow subvolume, preallocate the swapfile, and don't try to take snapshots of it, it should be fine.
ext4.
Never used arch; just slackware and then enterprise linux.
Don't use ZFS. It's that simple. It was always more of a buzzword than anything else, I feel, and the licensing issues just make it a non-starter for me. -Linux Torvalds
Realistically you aren't going to notice what filesystem you use, be it XFS, ext4, etc. Aside from fringe cases it really doesn't matter. Don't waste brain cycles on the decision.
For both my home server and desktop I use XFS for root and ZFS (in some variety of raid or mirror) for /home and data storage. Any time I've tried btrfs for root (such as default fedora), inevitably it poops the bed. At this point, I stay far away from btrfs.
I’ve been using XFS on top of LVM for years with no issues.