this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
104 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

1377 readers
194 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Returned devices are currently e-waste that can't be reassigned, per The Verge.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It was manufactured ewaste from the start.

It should have been shipped straight to the recycler directly from the factory and never bothered with the customer bit in the middle.

[–] FrankFrankson 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is the same thing as Rabbit R1 piece of shit except it's even worse.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

I didn't even realize that it wasn't the R1...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Never heard of these types of devices but they seem useless. These companies expected these AI pins to replace phones? Lmao

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Nah they don't, they immediately tried to sell the company after launching the product

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is what happens when you sell an expensive, bad, broken, unfinished product.

I think they are in the "find out" phase of FAFO.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Just read about the product.

Makes google glass sound genius.

[–] moistclump 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The AI Pin is a lapel pin that markets numerous features—like an AI voice assistant, camera, and laser projector—which its creators claim will replace smartphones as a go-to gadget. It costs $700 and requires a subscription that costs $24 per month, not including taxes and fees, for cloud storage, cellular data, and a number.

[–] TargaryenTKE 5 points 3 months ago

Well that just sounds like a terrible deal all around. Less than half of the features that make a smartphone valuable (almost necessary) for modern living, for roughly the same price. AND it's ugly, probably awkward to use, and best of all, nobody asked for this

[–] dog_ 4 points 3 months ago