The Metro Tunnel will improve things, but on its own it won’t alleviate the housing shortage. Melbourne needs to get over its fear of housing density and start replacing some of its bungalows and low-rise units with apartment developments (think 5-6 stories, with shops at floor level), and not assuming that each resident will own a car.
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)
Melbourne Trains
251 readers
9 users here now
About
c/MelbourneTrains is a community dedicated to all forms of public transport within the state of Victoria, Australia. We are a friendly and helpful community that welcomes anybody with an interest in Victoria public transport.
Rules
This community operates under the rules of aussie.zone. These apply to you regardless of which instance you are interacting from.
Credits
Community icon by @[email protected] featuring a W8 Class tram taken on April 17, 2022. Community banner by @[email protected] in the style of former Metropolitan PTV Platform sign. (aussie.zone icon in the community banner cleaned up by @[email protected].)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Anyone else got the nagging feeling that the tunnel is going to have hardly any visibly positive effect and be viewed in the short term as a big waste of time and money?
I’m not saying it wasn’t worth it. But I’m betting we see news articles about how few people use its stations/line and don’t notice improved frequency of trains on the other lines. And that PT usage is down anyway. And while the improved capacity is likely necessary going into the future, it may be pretty underwhelming in the short term.
Am I off here? Anyone else see obvious benefits from it?
It happens every time something other than a road is constructed.
True! Cars do tend to fill roads up though.
Maybe the media would make a fuss about Arden not being used much (because the area around it's not developed at all) but I think the system will be used pretty well. Honestly I think there will be a big improvement on the burnley and northern groups, because capacity will be freed up by moving Sunbury and Dandenong to the metro tunnel
I expect this will do wonders to improve the frequency and reliability of the Sunbury/Pakenham lines since they’ll be basically isolated from the rest of the network.
The government will need to keep separating lines from one another to fix the CBD crunch.
Yea it makes total sense that those lines will do very well out of this, for sure. And, that line is probably better connected now. No going through the loop and all of that confusion. Instead there will be stops at the south and north ends of the city and one near carlton or the vic market (as well as one near the botanical gardens and albert park if anyone is interested in that) ... with easy exchanges for Southern Cross and other lines.
But overall, yea, it does seem to pose the question of what to do with the loop. If it becomes clear that the Sunbury/Pakenham line is doing well as a metro style line ... why not all of the others too right, as you say?
I don't know if it's a common suggestion ... but would it be viable to simply take other lines out of the loop and have the trains turn around and stick to their line with dedicated trains just going around the loop for particular access to other parts of the CBD? It does seem the loop has had its time and that its retirement couldn't come sooner. The dense inner city has expanded beyond the boundaries of the Hoddle grid with Southbank, Docklands and general inner city development. While the connection between Flinders and Southern Cross seems like a massive and aging bottle neck. I don't know if it could feasibly be taken down, but it sure as hell is holding the whole north bank of the Yarra back. Are there freight trains that rely on this connection?
So, maybe utility trains running Flinders - Parliament - Melb Cent - Flagstaff - Southern Cross back and forth, regularly enough that you never have to worry about the schedule ... with all of the other lines terminating wherever and turning around. Not quite a metro, but could it maybe improve efficiency?
crazy that they wouldnt with all the freight and vline services in addition to Metro services.
Gotta say as someone who's been using the train system for three decades, this shit is badly needed, and has been for some time.
Our train system as is is good for Australia. That's kinda like saying I can beat up denizens of a kindergarten. Go try another country and you'll see why vast works are needed
Oh I'm not denying the need for upgrades etc. In fact, that's kinda my point, that one metro line is kinda small compared to what's needed and yet has been marketed as this massive world changing upgrade. Thus my fear that the political climate will consider it a waste of money and potentially start building more highways or something.
I’ll be honest, I’m not really sure what it will achieve other than new inner city stations? Parkville is needed due to the uni and hospitals, but I don’t really know how useful the others will be. The inner city is already exceptionally well serviced by public transport compared to the rest of Melbourne. So it kinda seems like it’s just making it better for existing users that already have it pretty damn good? I don’t live or work anywhere that will benefit, so I’m a bit meh about it.
The main point is to disentangle those lines from the city loop. That way more services can be run and since the lines will be independent a problem on one line won't bring down the entire network any more.
That Arden station facade is absolutely huge. But why? Why spend so much money on such a large facility when the Paris metro gets by fine with only using this much space. It just feels like it's more inconvenient for the users since they have to walk an extra couple of hundred metres for no good reason. And it looks unnecessarily expensive both in building costs and real estate when a smaller entrance would do just fine.