They should never have allowed the building of Stonehenge that close to the A303 in the first place.
Top tier comment section
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
24 points (92.9% liked)
United Kingdom
4138 readers
109 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
As much as I like getting a glimpse of Stonehenge every time I drive past, I support these plans.
Currently, the road goes from dual carriageway to oncoming traffic, with a limit of 50mph.
Once the traffic gets busy, all it takes is a few people rubbernecking to cause a large slowdown. And the merge at the end of the Amesbury Bypass can take 20 minutes on a bad day.
Adding extra lanes on the surface is unthinkable, and any route around would end up being a silly length.
If I'm reading the plans correctly, this also duals the road past Winterbourne Stoke. So possibly removing the chaos that can be Lonwbarrow Roundabout.
Wouldn't it be cheaper and more effective to just plant some trees? I would rather the money was spent elsewhere. This is a shocking waste.
I'm not sure what you mean?
It's a two-part problem, the road going from dual carriageway to single, and people wanting to grab a look on the way past.
Stonehenge is a unesco site on a plain, so widening the existing road, or planting a huge row of trees, is not going to go down well with the druids.
Getting the road out of site (by either tunnel or diversion) will go a long way to de-modernising the surroundings. (And a fun fact: Half of stonehenge was underpinned with concrete in the last century! So any ways to make it more natural are a plus.)
I don't object to a road being built. I object to £2.3b being spent on it. If the view is so much of a problem then spent a lot less and block it. Add a mound, put some trees there, even a wall would be cheaper.
If de-modernising is such a good thing can we all have it? OFC not because it would be bloody stupid, much like this hair-brained scheme is.
Shitty clickbait title though
How the area around Stonehenge will look, not Stonehenge itself
Stonehenge, by it's nature, can't be viewed outside of it's context. To view Stonehenge is to view it in its environment. It's appeal comes from being part of the landscape, rather than just placed in it.
view more: next ›