Freemasonry

180 readers

1 users here now

A place for Freemasons (and non-freemasons) to discuss the fraternity. No spam, no conspiracy theories, or bashing others. This is not a tyled area.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

dukethorion

[email protected]

Should Freemasonry be consolidated? (self.freemasonry)

submitted 1 year ago by JDBowden to c/freemasonry

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There are, how many, different additional degrees? Dozens, hundreds? It gets mind-numbing. Should Masonry focus on just a few (just Blue lodge), or keep it fractured?

Blue lodge, Royal Arch, Commandery, Knights Masons, etc etc

I fell down the rabbit hole years ago joining IDK how many different bodies until it just became ridiculous.

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] MyNamesNotMatt 1 points 1 year ago

The appendant bodies aren’t a fracturing of freemasonry. Blue lodge is freemasonry and the others will forever be the accessory. Blue lodge is fractured along all sorts of lines: geographically, racially, sexually, and even ritually.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I’m not sure about consolidate, but I also went down the rabbit hole once and all the appendant bodies I joined didn’t add anything so I demitted from all, and now just craft lodge for me.