this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
55 points (98.2% liked)

unions

1601 readers
91 users here now

a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc

Friends:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brygphilomena 3 points 1 month ago

Good job!! I am so proud of my former coworkers and former union members.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Let's go! When the workers can't even afford an apartment, much less a day at Disneyland for them and their families, you know they're in a bad spot. I hope they do strike and hold Disney accountable for this ridiculous exploitation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Cyn Carranza buffs, cleans, waxes and scrubs Disneyland floors starting at midnight, so that guests coming the next morning feel as if no one had been there before them.

But after her shifts working near a sparkling Sleeping Beauty Castle, she went “home” to a car, for about four months last year, because her wages, plus earnings at two other jobs, weren’t enough to afford renting a place with a bed.

Now, negotiating better wages and working conditions for Carranza and thousands of other Disneyland employees has gotten messy, to the point where 9,500 of them will conclude a vote on Friday that will authorize a potential strike.

While this potential strike would officially be about Disney not allowing union buttons to be worn at work, the underlying concern among rank-and-file workers is about the current contract that many say does not provide a livable wage.

Disneyland officials said in a statement that the parks strive to give guests “an uninterrupted, immersive experience,” and that “anything that distracts from the show or story, be it a non-approved button, pin or sticker worn by a cast member, would be addressed by a leader.”

Disney’s policy is that a leader would ask the employee to remove the union button to maintain the integrity of the “show.” Only repeated violations would warrant any disciplinary action, starting with a verbal warning.


The original article contains 1,176 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!