Did anyone actually expect decent upstream support from Qualcomm? I know they do upstream quite a bit, but when it comes down to their bread/butter it's generally kept private and on lockdown.
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
39 points (95.3% liked)
Linux
8411 readers
159 users here now
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Individuals engaged in volunteer PR for Qualcomm (due the belief that WoA is a silver bullet?) have used Linux support as a (minor) arguement.
What is WoA referring to?
Sorry, "Windows on ARM", the version of Windows that runs on laptops with Qualcomm's X Elite SoCs.