this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
-3 points (28.6% liked)

Jackson Hinkle

4 readers
5 users here now

Community for Jackson Hinkle and Legitimate Targets with Jackson Hinkle:


American made.

Jackson Hinkle is an American political commentator and influencer who hosts the web television show Legitimate Targets with Jackson Hinkle on Rumble.

Seeing through the smoke. Hosted by Jackson Hinkle


Rules:

  1. Try to be as civil as you can be; No Spamming/Trolling; ban for x days if problems arise
  2. Content must be relevant to JH or issues he discusses
  3. No Porn/Nudity in posts
  4. Personal attack - Attack the argument, not the person.

About:

  1. Fighting for a FREE AMERICA
  2. @FreeAmericaInst
  3. [email protected]
  4. https://t.me/jacksonhinkle

Links:

  1. x.com/jacksonhinklle
  2. rumble.com/c/c-6812123
  3. https://linktr.ee/jacksonhinkle
  4. jacksonhinkle.locals.com/support
  5. t.me/jacksonhinkle
  6. https://linktr.ee/jacksonhinkle

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17001781

#talk #israel #gaza #palestine

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jimmydoreisalefty 0 points 4 months ago

Talk’s Julia Hartley-Brewer takes on American commentator Jackson Hinkle, who tweeted about her looks on the site while accusing her of being a “genocide defender”.

“I’m glad you are making good money out of doing this,” Julia tells Jackson.

Summary 1:

  1. Julia challenges the guest’s double standard in justifying certain actions while condemning others.
  2. Personal attacks on social media detract from the intellectual discourse and undermine the credibility of arguments.
  3. The debate highlights the importance of focusing on substantive arguments rather than resorting to ad hominem attacks.

Summary 2:

  1. The speaker visited four homes in [Donbas] that were bombed by Ukrainian missiles.
  2. The town is not currently experiencing active fighting.
  3. The speaker believes that the people of Palestine and [Donbas] are both being oppressed.
  4. The interviewer accused the speaker of justifying Putin's actions in Ukraine due to past events.
  5. The speaker believes that the interviewer is picky with what they consider to be a provocation.
  6. The interviewer asked if the speaker had reported on the events in 2014.
  7. The speaker tweeted a picture of the interviewer and called them a "genocide defender."
  8. The interviewer asked if the speaker believed that attractiveness was relevant in arguments.
  9. The speaker stood by their tweet and found it hilarious.