Talk’s Julia Hartley-Brewer takes on American commentator Jackson Hinkle, who tweeted about her looks on the site while accusing her of being a “genocide defender”.
“I’m glad you are making good money out of doing this,” Julia tells Jackson.
Summary 1:
- Julia challenges the guest’s double standard in justifying certain actions while condemning others.
- Personal attacks on social media detract from the intellectual discourse and undermine the credibility of arguments.
- The debate highlights the importance of focusing on substantive arguments rather than resorting to ad hominem attacks.
Summary 2:
- The speaker visited four homes in [Donbas] that were bombed by Ukrainian missiles.
- The town is not currently experiencing active fighting.
- The speaker believes that the people of Palestine and [Donbas] are both being oppressed.
- The interviewer accused the speaker of justifying Putin's actions in Ukraine due to past events.
- The speaker believes that the interviewer is picky with what they consider to be a provocation.
- The interviewer asked if the speaker had reported on the events in 2014.
- The speaker tweeted a picture of the interviewer and called them a "genocide defender."
- The interviewer asked if the speaker believed that attractiveness was relevant in arguments.
- The speaker stood by their tweet and found it hilarious.