this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

World News

31423 readers
1598 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The myth of consensual diplomacy. They forgot to ask USA for permission.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Ya, fuck Russia and Putin but wtf standing is US got here to be making any comments...

Limp dick ex boyfriend vibes at best

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

but remember, freedom and democracy!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I guess unnaturalgasalsobad

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Again with this "Russia's Putin"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

as opposed to everybody elses putin

[–] Noodle07 16 points 1 week ago

Québec's poutine is pretty good

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Well yeah. Do you know another Putin who's visiting Vietnam? I don't

[–] InternetCitizen2 -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could be GOP's Putin. In this case they also happen to be the same person.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

looks like americans are still delusional enough to believe in the russiagate conspiracy theory...

[–] InternetCitizen2 -5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Current Russia and GOP are both authoritarians. Of course they would want to co-operate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"authoritarianism", is an absolutely useless term invented by liberals. is the us-sponsored genocide in palestine not "authoritarian"?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Your yummy democratic genocide vs. my disgusting authoritarian "cultural genocide"

[–] InternetCitizen2 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

is the us-sponsored genocide in palestine not “authoritarian”?

Fuck yeah it is, what kind of question is that?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

then why dont you claim that the biden admin is pro russian? lmao

[–] InternetCitizen2 -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am not sure what you are on about. I am anti authoritarian. I have no issue calling it out when the US does it. Rather than you who seem more interested in picking the Russian Empire's flavor.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

oh, youre of that sort, understood. in that case i just wonder why you associate putin with the republicans in particular.

also, current day russia is not an empire, as its capitalist economy hasnt yet reached the stage that makes imperialism possible and necessary. the current russian state, while right wing, is currently worthy of critical support due to being a beacon of resistance against the neocolonial west which is the main enemy of human development. please read vladimir lenins imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism and kwame nkrumahs neocolonialism, the last stage of imperialism

[–] InternetCitizen2 -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lamo im not going to support right wing anything. Russia is an empire the same way the USA is; they just happen to be the weaker empire. Not sure why you are wanting people to support other flavors of empire rather than simply rejecting imperialism all together.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

then you dont seem to know what imperialism means. i once again ask you to read theory. and yes, sometimes allying with rightists is in fact necessary: the ussr had to ally with the uk and us and mao had to form a united front with the kmt in order to defeat the fascists. you can still criticize your allies, thats what the critical part of critical support is for. dogmatists on the other hand have achieved nothing.

[–] InternetCitizen2 -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is Russia trying to take territory from Ukraine not empire? What about the fact that they subjugate and impose their will on Central Asian countries? If Russia supported Israel in its genocide, would it be okay because Russia has not reach a higher level of right wingness?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ahh yes russia, the county famously lacking in territory. the reason for the smo is the ukrainian western-aligned nazi regime violating the minsk accords by refusing to demilitarize, trying to join the fascist nato-block and murdering russian civilians for years on end. the russian government showed itself extremely lenient, to lenient even, as any sensible politician would have staged a military intervention much earlier. your hypothetical scenario about the zionist entity is bullshit, as only material reality matters. just read lenin ffs!

[–] InternetCitizen2 -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ahh yes russia, the county famously lacking in territory

And yet it fights for more.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

sorry, but you are obviously not willing to argue in good faith. the reasons for the smo have been stated clearly, yet you choose to prefer the state department propaganda line. your choice, i guess

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yo, define authoritarian in a way that doesn't include western bourgeois democracies or find a different word

The whole "authoritarian" nonsense has its roots in holocaust trivialization attempts in countries that collaborated with the nazis.

[–] InternetCitizen2 -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

holocaust trivialization

How exactly am I trying to excuse or deny the Holocaust? Are you suggesting that Russia and Israel bullying their smaller neighbor is not authoritarian? Are you suggesting Russia does not treat Central Asian nations the way the US treats those in Latin America? Bullying those around you is wrong no matter what party you are.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would look to historians like Dovid Katz and search for "double genocide theory", I would not like to make this an argument.

Please change your language when posting in the comm. "Authoritarian" and "totalitarian" are not useful descriptors and are historically connected to trying to equate the USSR and nazi Germany in order to do holocaust trivialization.

[–] InternetCitizen2 -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Authoritarian” and “totalitarian” are not useful descriptors

So what descriptors are useful?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are you trying to describe?

[–] InternetCitizen2 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think its clear that I am saying that Russia is an oppressive country with goals of being an empire. I am saying that it is wrong for them to do so, and more generally wrong for anyone to do so. Hence me calling them authoritarian and comparing them to the GOP.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay, well say those things instead then.

[–] InternetCitizen2 -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did all along. That is where my use of the word authoritarian is coming from.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Okay, but do you see what I am trying to communicate?

Use different language that isnt connected to a holocaust trivialization attempt.

[–] InternetCitizen2 -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So what form of authoritarian is Russia so that i can use the word for them?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like you're trying to argue when I'm trying very clearly to communicate,

"Your comments will be moderated if you keep using the word authoritarian"

[–] InternetCitizen2 -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So is it wrong to say that the US is authoritarian? Would that be trivializing the holocaust?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago