It's two-fold: lots of parking, and lack of good alternatives. If we just reduce parking requirements, but don't provide safe, reliable alternatives (eg quality public transit and bike lanes), you get angry drivers and sad (or dead) cyclists.
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
85 points (92.9% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5301 readers
767 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
absolutely - my hope is that businesses would rather push for public transit rather than buy more land and slather it with hot asphalt, if given the choice.
Of course they would! Public transit funded by the taxpayer is always going to be cheaper than privately funding parking. It would be a beautiful way to align interests to get business owners siding with urbanists to finally get more transit built.
There a lot of bad zoning laws in the usa, check your local laws to see how bad it is where you live
Houstons terrible, we have "no zoning" laws, but a mishmash of rules where we get the worst of both worlds.
Rollie is great, though it sorta seems like meat is his blind spot
Oh shit... I saw the thumbnail and got excited. I love this guy.
He went Tim Robinson mode.
Shout out to Henry Grabar’s Paved Paradise
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/10/books/review/paved-paradise-henry-grabar.html