this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

Science

1224 readers
5 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

founded 2 years ago
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I came here to complain about the measurement too, so I'm converting it.
The Asteroid is 850m across, which is about 28 blue whales long, or 283 bottlenose dolphins, or 1118 golden retrievers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

850m? What's m? That's not a SI unit (Stupid Imperial)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My bad, that is 18.5 Statues of Liberty, or 2 Empire State Buildings, or slightly less than 1 Texas.
Are those freedom units good enough?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Amazingly, yes, all of those are actually helpful lmao

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's approximately 2789 freedom feet

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You gotta give it to us in refrigerators or we're not gonna know what you're talking about.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm gonna be real with you, I don't know how big a narwhal is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

about 1/99th the size of the asteroid passing us rn.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not to worry, here's gpt's answer:

To begin with, we need to know the average volume of a narwhal. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the average length of a male narwhal is about 16 feet (4.9 meters) and its weight is about 1,800 kg. The volume of a narwhal can be calculated by using the formula for the volume of a cylinder, where the radius is half of the length.

Volume of a cylinder = π × r^2 × h

Radius = length/2 = 4.9/2 = 2.45 meters

Height = 16 feet ≈ 4.9 meters

Volume of a narwhal = π × 2.45^2 × 4.9 ≈ 96.3 cubic meters

Next, we can estimate the volume of a banana. The volume of a banana may vary depending on its size and shape. For simplicity, let's assume that a medium-sized banana has a volume of 100 cubic centimeters (cc) or 0.1 liters.

Now, we can divide the volume of a narwhal by the volume of a banana to get an estimate of the number of bananas needed to fill the narwhal's volume.

Number of bananas = Volume of narwhal / Volume of banana

Number of bananas ≈ 96,300,000 cc / 100 cc = 963,000 bananas

Therefore, it would take around 963,000 bananas to fill the volume of one narwhal, although this estimate may not be very accurate due to the assumptions and approximations made.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Can someone convert that to bananas for me

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I was too lazy to do this manually, so I punched it into GPT 4. I did verify that the math, indeed, checks out.

Edit: Sorry for the edits. GPT assumed the tusk in the calculation, so I had to ask it to remove the tusk for this math to check out properly.

  1. The size of a narwhal: Narwhals typically range in size, but males on average can be about 4.7 meters long.
  2. The length of a banana: The length of a banana varies, but a typical banana is about 18 centimeters long.

Let's start by converting the asteroid size from narwhals to meters.

If 99 narwhals equal 850 meters, then one narwhal would be approximately 850/99 ≈ 8.59 meters.

Now, this doesn't match the usual size of a narwhal that we have (4.7 meters). There might be a discrepancy in the calculation, but for the sake of this exercise, let's use the size provided.

Now, let's convert the asteroid size to bananas.

850 meters is equivalent to 850 * 100 = 85000 centimeters.

If 1 banana is 18 cm, then:
85000 cm / 18 cm/banana ≈ 4722.22 bananas.

So, the asteroid is approximately 4722 bananas long, if we base the calculation on the given size of the narwhal. But please note, this is a fun approximation and might not be precise.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I went to http://bananaforscale.info which returned 4775.281 bananas. That's similar to your last number

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

4722.22 bananas

4775.281 bananas

Mental note: GPT-4 has a comparatively big measuring banana

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you good human, I now have an excellent, exactly approximate idea of how big the 99 narwhals meteor is. 👏🎉🏆

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Colossal banana the size of 99 narwhals to pass Earth Thursday - NASA

[–] FantasticFox 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The narwhal bacons at midnight 🤪

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Hi, OP here, I just want to thank you personally for what you've done.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

How many half giraffes?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Narwhals sure are an interesting unit of measurement.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

99 narwhals? How many football fields is that? And bananas? If we stop using standard units I’m lost xD

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The average weight of an adult male narwhal is 800 to 1,600 kg (1,760 to 3,530 lb)
Using https://www.converttobananas.com/weight-converter/ that's 7054 to 14109 bananas per narwhal....
or 698,345 to 1,396,791 bananas for 99 of them

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks! At least something we can al understand!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

@ivlarac pretty much just coming here to ask about units of measurement too.... I think TheRegister has a converter....

@DoucheAsaurus

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Does someone feels the courage to open /m/anythingbutmetric?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Size is a terrible word to use. Something with a length of 99 narwhals is far bigger than one with the mass of 99 narwhals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is true, someone who is smarter than I will have to figure out how many narwhals it weighs though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just under 40,000 narwhals, assuming a narwhal has the mass of 1600 kg and is 5 meters long.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Is.. is that a safe assumption...?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Narwhal for scale.

[–] overzeetop 3 points 1 year ago

That’s going to be quite the commotion.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not surprising, that's a pretty small explosion for a day in Texas.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

And this is how today I learnt that the Brooklyn Bridge is the size of 99 narwhals: https://usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/06/13/nasa-asteroid-brooklyn-bridge-passing-earth/70316864007/

And an orca is the size of 1.18 narwhals: https://www.jpost.com/science/article-745973

And, finally, an alpaca is the size of 5.6 orcas or 6.6 narwhals: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/asteroid-the-size-of-15-alpacas-to-fly-past-earth-on-monday-nasa/ar-AA1cHfy5

I'm not a New Yorker, but it looks to me like the Brooklyn Bridge should be able to fit more than 15 alpacas.

load more comments
view more: next ›