His career records are impressive, and they even acknowledge that the records are incomplete. As it says on his tombstone, “Legendary Baseball Player”.
MLB
Welcome to the MLB Lemmy.World community!
Rules:
- This is a place for baseball fans to discuss anything related to baseball. All posts should relate to the teams, players (past, present, or potential future members), managers, or MLB staff. Posts about MiLB or international leagues are allowed, although ideally should focus on prospects that may join the MLB.
- Keep things civil. Criticism of teams, the league, etc. is fine, but this isn't the place to insult fans of a team you don't like. Don't insult other users. Slurs and hate speech are not tolerated, regardless of whether you're talking about users, players, or anyone else.
- Follow site-wide rules.
It seems problematic to incorporate the stats from two different leagues. Josh Gibson wasn't hitting against the same pitchers as Ty Cob or Babe Ruth. Those guys were hitting against the best pitchers in the world. I'm not trying to devalue Gibson's accomplishments, but the criteria to establish the records wasn't the same.
Baseball stats had already incorporated multiple major leagues, some of which folded in the 1800s. Hell, the National League and American League are technically two separate leagues that used to have their own rules. Not to mention that the game has changed a lot in the nearly 150 years that the stats incorporate, from rule changes to different scheduling to better training regimens. With all that I think adding in the Negro Leagues stats isn't too problematic at all.
Those are good points.
And Babe Ruth and Sammy Sosa weren't hitting against the same kind of pitchers. I'd say Ruth and Gibson were probably facing pitchers and fielders with more in common than those of different eras. Stats always come with context. Doesn't mean they don't belong together in the same list.
Seems like a worthwhile discrepancy to ignore considering how marginalized they were back then. Im OK with it.