I prefer to see the branding in case I want to buy one myself. Unless it's a blatant ad, I never really felt annoyed by a visible brand or logo.
this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
23 points (87.1% liked)
Shirts That Go Hard
3859 readers
21 users here now
Share shirts that go hard.
Community Rules
No racism, xenophobia, sexualism, supremacism, sexualization of minors, rape content
Also, follow the Terms of Service/rules of Lemmy.World.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
23
[Community Discussion] Should we enact a new rule that would demand the removal of branding in images?
(self.shirtsthatgohard)
Yeah, I don't consider this a problem (yet). I don't think it should be banned until it becomes a problem here.
What about branding that is the target of the "going hard"?
Say an anti-cigarette-company image, that, oh, e.g. identifies the average-life-span of the "Marlboro Man" models who smoked Marlboros??
Differentiate based on how it is being implimented in the image, not on the fact that it exists.
Disallowing brand-images would disallow criticism of those brands from appearing here, wouldn't it?
Beware of clumsy law!
( :