I prefer to see the branding in case I want to buy one myself. Unless it's a blatant ad, I never really felt annoyed by a visible brand or logo.
this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
23 points (87.1% liked)
Shirts That Go Hard
3859 readers
7 users here now
Share shirts that go hard.
Community Rules
No racism, xenophobia, sexualism, supremacism, sexualization of minors, rape content
Also, follow the Terms of Service/rules of Lemmy.World.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
23
[Community Discussion] Should we enact a new rule that would demand the removal of branding in images?
(self.shirtsthatgohard)
Yeah, I don't consider this a problem (yet). I don't think it should be banned until it becomes a problem here.
What about branding that is the target of the "going hard"?
Say an anti-cigarette-company image, that, oh, e.g. identifies the average-life-span of the "Marlboro Man" models who smoked Marlboros??
Differentiate based on how it is being implimented in the image, not on the fact that it exists.
Disallowing brand-images would disallow criticism of those brands from appearing here, wouldn't it?
Beware of clumsy law!
( :