this post was submitted on 23 May 2024

154 points (78.9% liked)

Technology

59087 readers

4680 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

154

The double sexism of ChatGPT’s flirty “Her” voice (www.vox.com)

submitted 5 months ago by jeffw to c/technology

70 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 2) 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] BrownianMotion -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I've listened to it, and it sounds nothing like Scarlett does. I had to find a movie with Scarlett in it to compare with, and I can honestly tell you ChatGPT sounds nothing like Natasha in Black Widow.

(Joke aside, ChatGPT doesn't sound like Scarlett at all).

load more comments (3 replies)

[+] Cringe2793 -28 points 5 months ago (9 children)

She has a very generic sounding American sultry woman voice, imo. Seems like a money grab to me. She's not dumb, she sued Disney for some nonsense, and now she's starting shit with the soon to be biggest company in the world.

She's just latching onto the fact that any time women complain about shit like this, and use words like sexism, gaslighting, misogyny, etc, it gets a lot of traction in the media.

What a horrible woman.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Didn't she sue Disney for breach of contract? That doesn't sound like nonsense.

[–] Cringe2793 -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nope. She sued because she felt she was owed more money. Disney released the movie on their streaming service at the same time as it was released in cinema.

There was no "breach of contract", otherwise she would have won easily. Instead, she and Disney settled out of court. She was just being greedy. Disney probably didn't want the bad publicity and paid her off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Settling out of court doesn't imply no one did anything wrong lol.

[–] Cringe2793 -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It also doesn't imply one did something wrong. They could just want to "pay the ransom" so their name doesn't get spread through the mud.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I literally never said it did. But you did say it implied the opposite.

[–] Cringe2793 -1 points 5 months ago

Sure, believe what you want to believe. I literally cannot be bothered to educate you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ok woman hater

[–] Cringe2793 -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Resorting to name calling I see 😂😂😂 that's what happens when you know I'm right, but refuse to change your wrong views.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Oh honey. Oh no that wasnt an insult. Id be more creative! I was stating a fact. Your posting history shows us that the Phantasm of scapegoat is allowing you to stand on both sides of the contradiction, simultaneously.

So, you can keep going down this path youre on. We both know where it leads though. Loneliness, and nothing good.

OR: Watch this Kratos lookin guy break down what's been going on in this area of thought for over a decade, and begin to heal, and then maybe you'll be able to make friends with people without expecting anything in return.

You deserve that. You deserve to be on both sides of that, and not the phantasm.

[–] Cringe2793 -1 points 5 months ago

That's a lot of assumptions you're making about me. I mean, if you can't believe that scarjo is doing this for the money, then so be it.

Far be it from me to try to tell you how to think. Believe what you want. I really can't be bothered to correct you. And yes, what you're doing is name calling, just because I believe a different thing from you. I shall not be replying to you any more, since you have no basic respect. Cheers!

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (7 replies)

load more comments