this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

Tesla

168 readers
7 users here now

The Tesla community of lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The company is apparently awaiting regulatory approval.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andrewta 10 points 4 months ago

Love the idea of Tesla, getting charged for full usage of the battery that I already bought? Yeah bite me.

[–] tux 7 points 4 months ago

Looking forward to the lawsuits on this going forward.

Not really sure how you've bought a car if they can paywall physical features. otherwise folks should ask for pay for hauling /storing "tesla's" extra batteries around

[–] Got_Bent 5 points 4 months ago

At some point, my car is going to be a skateboard. These shitty subscriptions that companies are rolling out can bite me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Pending “regulatory approval,” he wrote that the company will unlock another 40–60 miles of total range, depending on which battery Model Y owners have, “for $1,500 to $2,000.”

The company revealed back in 2016 that the 70kWh battery in the Model S 70 actually had 75kWh of capacity that customers could pay more than $3,000 to access.

The auto industry, in general, has been trending toward controlling access to cars’ existing features with pay-to-remove software locks.

Mercedes-Benz charged the same amount, but annually, to improve the horsepower and torque of the EQE and EQS.

BMW once paywalled software-locked CarPlay and, later, heated seats (the company later dropped that plan).

And of course, Tesla has proven itself willing to remotely disable paid-for features when one of its cars is resold.


The original article contains 250 words, the summary contains 129 words. Saved 48%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!