this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
18 points (87.5% liked)

Monero

1461 readers
1 users here now

This is the lemmy community of Monero (XMR), a secure, private, untraceable currency that is open-source and freely available to all.

GitHub

StackExchange

Twitter

Wallets

Desktop (CLI, GUI)

Desktop (Feather)

Mac & Linux (Cake Wallet)

Web (MyMonero)

Android (Monerujo)

Android (MyMonero)

Android (Cake Wallet) / (Monero.com)

Android (Stack Wallet)

iOS (MyMonero)

iOS (Cake Wallet) / (Monero.com)

iOS (Stack Wallet)

iOS (Edge Wallet)

Instance tags for discoverability:

Monero, XMR, crypto, cryptocurrency

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This may be a new attack tactic. By flooding the TX pool with large transactions they are trying to artificially jack up TX costs since the spam attack did not work.

As usual Monero will learn from this and improve. ๐Ÿ‘ It is best to go through all this while Monero is still not a top world currency.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Some say this sudden increase in transaction volume is the result of Bitcoiners fleeing into Monero after the recent publicity proving that No-KYC Bitcoin use is de-facto illegal.

I choose to believe this regardless of whether it's true or not. ๐Ÿ˜

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Doubt it, they will just go all KYC and wait for bags to pump. The people still in BTC do not care about self-custody.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is that the actual fee needed to get a 2in/2out tx into the next block or is this literally just the median of fees paid, distorted by the huge consolidation transactions?

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Just the median of fees paid. Actual is about 0.001145 ( 0.14 USD)

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow. Is there an analysis or write-up on these attacks?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

@Rucknium taking the lead on analysis here.

check the paper he wrote re: the first wave on his git here

https://github.com/Rucknium/misc-research/blob/main/Monero-Black-Marble-Flood/pdf/monero-black-marble-flood.pdf

then on this wave - fat input transactions filling blocks on XMR chain :

Thanks for mentioning my paper. It analyzed the privacy impact of an adversary owning many outputs. The transactions that are congesting the mempool/txpool now have many inputs. There may be a privacy impact of large many-input txs, but I don't have a clear idea of what it would be, and it's not the same as a standard black marble flood.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

that's incorrect.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I think now is about the only time that is possible, especially after the next block having. I doubt it will ever happen again.