this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
397 points (97.8% liked)

World News

32363 readers
239 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a bill that would expand the federal definition of anti-Semitism, despite opposition from civil liberties groups.

The bill passed the House on Wednesday by a margin of 320 to 91, and it is largely seen as a reaction to the ongoing antiwar protests unfolding on US university campuses. It now goes to the Senate for consideration.

If the bill were to become law, it would codify a definition of anti-Semitism created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

IHRA’s working definition of anti-Semitism is “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”.

According to the IHRA, that definition also encompasses the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity”.

The group also includes certain examples in its definition to illustrate anti-Semitism. Saying, for instance, that “the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” would be deemed anti-Semitic under its terms. The definition also bars any comparison between “contemporary Israeli policy” and “that of the Nazis”.

Rights groups, however, have raised concerns the definition nevertheless conflates criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism with anti-Semitism.

In a letter sent to lawmakers on Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) urged House members to vote against the legislation, saying federal law already prohibits anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment.

“Instead, it would likely chill free speech of students on college campuses by incorrectly equating criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.”

Archive link

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ultragigagigantic 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Nazis: "we will fight to the death for your right to speak it!"

Divest israel: "Believe it or not, jail, right away."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

What an odd thing to say...

[–] Mrkawfee 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To find out who controls you, see who you're not allowed to criticise

[–] finkrat 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Modern Israel is not Judaism! It's not the same theocracy described in the old testament. It's not even religiously pure, there's a sizeable Christian and Muslim population. It's perfectly valid to respect Jews and and their beliefs, and to criticize Netanyahu's government for attempting to crush Palestine and kill its civilians indiscriminately in raids. Jewish folks in the US and abroad are joining in the protests to stop the war - this isn't about being antisemitic, this is telling a very atrocious government to stop behaving as a similarly atrocious government did 80 years ago

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Even the Jewish community in Germany is against Netanjahus way of treating Palestine.

[–] johannesvanderwhales 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Note that this isn't going anywhere; the senate won't take it up.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Hope you're right!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Tens of thousands of civilian casualties is the price we are willing to pay for a strategic military asset the the middle east.

After all, tens of thousands of civilian casualties is the price we are willing to pay for the 2nd amendment.

We'd be hypocrites otherwise.

-- US Congress, probably.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›