this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
32 points (94.4% liked)

Lemmy

2172 readers
1 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to [email protected].

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
32
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by hydra to c/[email protected]
 

This troll used an admin name with one more letter. How do we deal with admin identity theft? Should instance admins reserve usernames preemptively? This troll will likely try u/Desssalines or something similar next. Maybe mod/admin flairs should be more flashy to avoid such confusions?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'm thinking maybe a new feature where instances can switch off custom display names for new users, or wait X days/X threshold until new users' custom display names are made public?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can't currently check, but don't admins already have a shield icon next to their username?

Edit: typo

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just checked, the admin have a little "admin" text next to their username and moderators in a community have the text "mod" next to their username.

[–] XanXic 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Feels like that solves itself then as more people see those tags. Just ban these when it pops up and look for those. Reddits never been had issues with someone confusing u/spez with u/spezz or u/speez day old accounts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Feels like that solves itself then as more people see those tags. Just ban these when it pops up and look for those. Reddits never been had issues with someone confusing u/spez with u/spezz or u/speez day old accounts.

Yeah exactly, it's definitely something that will solve itself. The moment, more people are familiar with the interface, the less impact it will have.

load more comments
view more: next ›