this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
64 points (98.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5186 readers
653 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (4 children)

This "new" revelation seems so bizzar after watching the skiiable snow recede and disappear from the Rockies over the past 40 years... Did people not realize what was happening? I mean, we all knew it was climate change.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think that, as usual, they didn't care until it affected them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

There was a pretty intense campaign by the fossil fuels industry to convince people that nothing was happening.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Plenty of us live nowhere near any skiable snow. It isn’t particularly surprising to hear about, but not everyone sees the snow receding for themselves over decades. Personally, I find it bizarre that the focus of this article is primarily on the migration of a sport and barely touches on the ecological impact for all the species that are adapted to and dependent on snowy weather. We don’t need skiing to live.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Yup. 16 years ago as I was finishing high school, my friends and I would have a solid 2-3 month window of going to play in the snow on a nearby stretch of mountains. We’d go several times a year every couple weeks. Now, the ski resort there is lucky to have 2-3 weeks of usable snow.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well this effects the rich fucks. Maybe they'll pay attention now. (Yeah right.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Most regular skiers are generally pretty climate conscious. Like other outdoorsy sports.

[–] BallsandBayonets 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

However the people getting rich off the skiers are not, and they're the ones whose bank accounts stand to be impacted by a lack of snow.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

They're even more aware, because, as you said, it's impacting their bank accounts. For example, Aspen has been quite public about climate change for a while https://aspen.gov/518/Climate-Action

I'm not sure what you're getting at. The ski industry isn't powerful enough to just fix climate change whenever it wants to. There are much more powerful forces at work.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Oh no! If it would only affect our food supplies, our water, ability to survive, plants and animals it would be a minor nuisance. But skiing? Someone call the national guard! 😭