this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
60 points (96.9% liked)

World News

38980 readers
4471 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Sigh. People need to educate themselves on radiation. Its not overly complex and it's actually really interesting. There's no threat here, bananas are more dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder how bad this is going to be. I hope my country starts checking for radioactivity in fish imported. Considering that some fish can travel quite far I wouldn’t be surprised if the ones from anywhere near Japan and close countries could have unsafe levels of radiation.

I read some article last week mentioning that the advanced filtering system for water was practically useless. Hopefully I just understood it wrong.

[–] raltoid 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You'll get more radiation climbing a mountain or taking an airplane ride than drinking water just off the coast where it's being released.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh. That’s great to know. I thought it was more serious considering other countries were banning imports from those regions.

[–] Wholesalechicken 1 points 1 year ago

Basically the same logic was applied when Germans voted to decomission their nuclear plants.

[–] xlsma 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great so maybe Japan should use that water for internal consumption then? Obviously they won't do that, so can't complain when other countries are uncomfortable with it.

[–] raltoid 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Obviously they won’t do that,

Are you basing that statement on a source or do you have some information on that? Or are you just guessing based on your own emotions, over how you wouldn't do that?

[–] xlsma 1 points 1 year ago

You wouldn't need scientific proof that most people wouldn't eat shit either. It's a reasonable assumption given that after all their analysis, meetings, debates etc their solution is to dump it into the ocean and not for internal consumption. This move is bad for their international pr, so logically if there is a better/more accepted option they would have chose it. Unless you are telling me that this decision is more likely made in vacuum and the decision makers are not very smart.