this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
1554 points (96.4% liked)

Political Memes

5598 readers
2953 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (10 children)

To play Devil's Advocate, the people would only still live there without risk of inescapable debt if they had the qualifications to obtain a loan and pay down payment, as well as means to continue making payments until the property sells again or is paid off. Getting evicted by a landlord sucks but it's still way better than owing the bank money because they can and will come after you for it.

On the flip side, though, you can still get equity from paying a mortgage, so it's possible to sell the property and if it sells fast enough you could pay off the loan without excess interest during hard times.

Buying property comes with risks that renting properties do not have.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (9 children)

If I'm understanding you correctly, I disagree. Homeowners aren't providing a service to renters by allowing them to live "risk free". The "risk" that a homeowner is incurring is the risk of becoming a renter, same as the risk that an owner of a company incurs is just the risk of having to become a worker.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (34 children)

Some of them might've not been able to (or wanted to) pay for the home ownership. But if this assumes someone not making profit was renting it out then yeah

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] Canyon201 2 points 9 months ago

How can you be so heartless to someone that is diversifying their income stream?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›