this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)

Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )

5650 readers
50 users here now

Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!

Rules

Other Football/Soccer Related Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Chelsea will unveil their new kit on Monday without a front-of-shirt sponsor.

The west London side had been in talks with gambling firm Stake, who also have deals with Everton and Watford, but fans were vocal in their opposition to that potential deal and nothing was agreed upon.

Previously, Chelsea had agreed a deal with U.S. streaming service Paramount Plus. That, though, was rejected by the Premier League due to concerns it could cause problems with the league’s broadcast partners.

Chelsea had hoped to complete a deal with Paramount Plus, but this was judged to not be permitted under the Deed of License – the contract between clubs and the Premier League, which covers matters including broadcasting and commercial deals.

Sky Sports, BT Sport (soon to be TNT Sports) and Amazon Prime are the Premier League’s current broadcast partners in the UK, and the league has a TV deal with NBC Sports in the U.S.

Talks with other potential partners are ongoing but the launch will go ahead without a front-of-shirt sponsor, as reported by the Daily Mail. There has not yet been any news of Chelsea’s sleeve sponsor after previous partners Whalefin pulled out of its agreement with the Premier League side.

The Creative Artists Agency is leading the process to secure Chelsea a new sponsor, with the club expecting a deal to be done before the start of the season on August 13.

Chelsea have been seeking a new front-of-shirt sponsor after their three-year deal with telecommunications network 3 UK expired at the end of last season. Before that, Japanese firm Yokohama Tires had sponsored the west London club.

Chelsea are one of five Premier League teams not to release a kit ahead of the new season. None of the newly-promoted trio of Luton Town, Sheffield United and Burnley have, as well as Nottingham Forest and West Ham United. Forest’s launch, though, is planned for next week

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I hope this means that we'll be able to buy the kit without a sponsor, might be the first kit I buy in years if that's the case

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't be surprised if they delay the kit reveal a week or so if they are close to finding a sponsor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If that's gonna be the case, I'll be so envious of Chelsea fans. Would kill to be able to buy a kit without a sponsor!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I did that when Barcelona didn't have a sponsor a few seasons ago. It looks so much cleaner without a big logo at the front.

[–] flamindinky 4 points 1 year ago

Wow, that is a little surprising. You'd think big deals like this are finalised well ahead of time.